Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 279 (CHH)

RAJKUMAR MESHRAM v. SHYAM VERMA

ACQA/73/2025 · 2026-03-18

Shri Ravindra Kumar Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR ACQA No. 73 of 2025 1 - Rajkumar Meshram S/o Ramkhelan Meshram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Village- Singarbhat, Police Station and Tahsil- Khairagarh, District Rajnandgaon Now District : Khairagarh-Chhuikhadan-Gandai, Chhattisgarh ... Appellant versus 1 - Shyam Verma S/o Sri Kanglu Ram Verma, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ward No. 09 Shankarpur Rajnandgaon, Tahsil and District Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh. (Accused) ... Respondent Order Sheet 19-03-2026 Mr. Ankush Borkar and Mr. Hardik Jaiswal, Advocates for the appellant. In view of recent decision of Supreme Court in case of M/s Celestium Financial Vs. A. Gnanasekaran Etc. reported in 2025 INSC 804, learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of present appeal with liberty to file an Appeal under proviso to Section 372 of CrPC (413 of BNSS) before the appropriate court. Prayer is allowed. Accordingly, the present appeal is disposed of as withdrawn with liberty to file an appeal within a period of 60 days Digitally signed by MOHAMMED AADIL KHAN Date: 2026.03.25 19:14:39 +0530 2 from today before the appropriate court in accordance with law. It is made clear that if such an appeal is filed before the concerned court within the time given, it would not insist upon the limitation while deciding the same and will proceed to decide the matter in accordance with law. Registry shall return the certified copy of the impugned order/judgment and relevant documents to the counsel for the petitioner after retaining photocopy of the same. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge Aadil