[2025:RJ-JP:34659] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10474/2025 Anil Dhingra S/o Shri Mahendra Singh Dhingra, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Koliyo Ke Mandir Ke Piche, Chawani Police Station Gu- manpura, District Kota (Raj.). (At Present Confined In District Jail, Kota). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Avtar Singh Rathore For Respondent(s) For Complainant(s) : : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP Mr. Mayank Kumar Choudhary HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 29/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.427/2022 registered at Police Station Gumanpura, District Kota City (Rajasthan) for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Counsel submits that there is dispute between the parties with regard to the ancestral property. Counsel submits that it has been alleged that petitioner prepared forged Will of his father. Counsel submits that civil suit for partition and permanent injunction is pending between the parties. Counsel submits that genuineness of the Will shall be adjudged by the Civil Court in the civil proceedings. Counsel [2025:RJ-JP:34659] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10474/2025] submits that there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner of similar nature. It is submitted that trial will take considerable time in its conclusion. Counsel submits that petitioner is in custody since 05.08.2025 and further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor assisted by learned counsel for the complainant vehemently oppose the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the parties, as also the fact that civil dispute is also pending between the parties; alleged offences is based on documents and same is in possession of the investigating agency; there are no criminal antecedents of the petitioner of similar nature and trial will take considerable time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it fit and proper to allow this bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -Anil Dhingra S/o Shri Mahendra Singh Dhingra shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand only) each to the satisfaction of the learned Trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any court to which the matter is transferred, [2025:RJ-JP:34659] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10474/2025] on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. The observations made hereinabove are only for decision of the instant bail application and would not have any impact on the trial of the case in any manner. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN ), J LALIT MOHAN /138