Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
--1--
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI
C.M.P. No. 764 of 2022
---- Dinesh Kumar Mishra, aged about 69 years son of Devjanam Mishra, resident of 33/1/B, Road No. 06, Bagbera Colony, P.O.-Tatanagar, P.S. Bagbera, Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum .... Petitioner -- Versus --
1. Smt. Janki Devi D/o Saheb Singh, W/o Yadu Nandan Singh, resident of Jagdishpur Road, Harharguttu, P.S. Bagbera, P.O. Harharguttu, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum.
2. Anil Singh son of Late Prabhu Singh, resident of Bagbera Colony, Road No. 6, P.S. Bagbera, P.O. Tatanagar, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum.
3. Laxmi Devi W/o Late Prabhu Singh, resident of Bagbera Colony, Road No. 6, P.S. Bagbera, P.O. Tatanagar, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum
4. Sambhu Singh son of Late Saheb Singh, resident of Bagbera Colony, Road No. 6, P.S. Bagbera, P.O. Tatanagar, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum.
5. Rajbalabh Singh son of Late Saheb Singh, resident of Bagbera Colony, Road No. 6, P.S. Bagbera, P.O. Tatanagar, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum.
6. Smt. Mahayati Devi W/o Milan Roy, resident of Bagbera Colony, Road No. 6, P.S. Bagbera, P.O. Tatanagar, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum.
7. Smt. Renuka Roy W/o Late Baiju Roy, resident of Bagbera Colony, Road No. 6, P.S. Bagbera, P.O. Tatanagar, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum.
8. Ashish Roy son of Late Baiju Roy, resident of Bagbera Colony, Road No. 6, P.S. Bagbera, P.O. Tatanagar, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum
9. Minor Sanket Ujwal Roy son of Late Baiju Roy through his natural guardian and mother Respondent No. 7, Smt. Renuka Roy, resident of Bagbera Colony, Road No. 6, P.S. Bagbera, P.O. Tatanagar, Town Jamshedpur, District East Singhbhum
.... Respondents
----
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
---
For the Petitioner :- Mr. Binod Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondents :-
---- 12/08.01.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this petition with liberty to move before the Executing
--2--
Court with regard to his grievance, as it is well settled that any objection can be decided by the Executing Court.
2. Permission is accorded.
3. As such, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
(Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Rashmi/