Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27889 (ALL)

SMT. ROSHANI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/7066/2025 · 2025-03-09

Anish Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:34297-DB Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7066 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt. Roshani Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Vimal Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Sunil Kumar Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J. 1. The petitioner is claiming lease back of the abadi area of her land on basis of Yamuna Expressway Industrial Development Authority Rural Abadi Site (Management and Regularisation) Regulation, 2011. The prayer made in the petition is for a direction to the authorities to decide the representation of the petitioner made in this behalf. 2. In the writ petition it has not been disclosed when the land of the petitioner was acquired. No acquisition notification has been annexed. It has also not been disclosed when award was made. 3. Sri Sunil Kumar, learned counsel for the respondent - Authority is also not able to explain anything and we find him to be completely at a loss. 4. In these circumstances, we are not in a position to examine even prima-facie the claim of the petitioner. 5. The petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to file a better petition. (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Order Date :- 10.3.2025 gp Digitally signed by :- GANESH PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad