UMESH KUMAR YADAV SON OF SHRI RAJENDRA PRASAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/13818/2020 · 2025-06-19
Maneesh Sharma
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27885 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27885 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:23343] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 24763/2018 Umesh Kumar Yadav S/o Shri Rajender Prasad Yadav, Aged About 34 Years, Resident Of Village Dunduria, Post Piplee, Tehsil Behror, District, Alwar. ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary Education, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Secondary Education, Bikaner.
3. The Joint Director (Admn.), Directorate Of Education, Bikaner.
4. District Education Officer (Secondary), Education Department, Alwar.
5. Chief District Education Officer, Education Department, Alwar.
6. Shri Ramesh Chand Choudhary, Additional District Education Officer, (Surplus) (Secondary-Ii), Alwar. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13818/2020 Umesh Kumar Yadav Son Of Shri Rajendra Prasad, Aged About 39 Years, Resident Of Village Dhundhariya, Tehsil- Behror, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary To The Government, Department Of Secondary Education, Government Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.)
2. Director, Secondary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner (Raj.)
3. District Education Officer (Headquarter), Secondary Education Department, Near Overbridge, Alwar (Raj.)
4. Chief Block Officer, Secondary Education Department, Behror, District Alwar (Raj.) ----Respondents
[2025:RJ-JP:23343] (2 of 2) [CW-24763/2018] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mahendra Verma for Mr. Dinesh Yadav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary GA cum AAG with Mr. Vinod Sharma HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.) Order 19/06/2025
1. Counsel for petitioner, on instructions of petitioner, submits that petitioner does not want to pursue these petitions on merits and seeks permission to withdraw the same.
2. Accordingly, the present petitions are dismissed as withdrawn.
3. Any other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(MANEESH SHARMA (V. J.)),J SOURAV /119-120