Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8536 MFA No. 4740 of 2016 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 4740 OF 2016 (MV-I) BETWEEN:
SRI. RAJU, S/O LATE ANJI @ RAMANJINAPPA, AGED ABOUT 10 YEARS, SINCE MINOR, REPRESENTED BY HIS FATHER & NATURAL GUARDIAN ANJI @ RAMANJINAPPA, S/O MARAPPA, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/A CLT., OPP. SHANKARAPPA BUILDING, JAKKUR, BANGALORE - 560 064. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. ADINARAYAN, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)) AND:
1.
SRI. B.S. RUDRA ARADHYA, S/O SRIKANTAIAH B.H, MAJOR, R/A NO.3797, DODDABALLAPURA TOWN, BANGALORE RURAL DISTRICT - 561 203.
2.
UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., NO.1872, IST FLOOR, 20TH MAIN, MARENAHALLI MAIN ROAD, VIJAYANAGAR, BANGALORE - 560 040.
3.
SRI. ZEESAN @ ZEESAN KHAN, S/O ANWAR KHAN, Digitally signed by AASEEFA PARVEEN Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8536 MFA No. 4740 of 2016 AGED ABOUT 18 YEARS, R/A BHABU SUPER GREEN NURSERY, JAKKUR MAIN ROAD, JAKKUR, YELAHANKA HOBLI BANGALORE - 560 064.
4.
SRI. ANWAR KHAN, S/O NAWAB KHAN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/A BHABU SUPER GREEN NURSERY, JAKKUR MAIN ROAD, JAKKUR, YELAHANKA HOBLI, BANGALORE - 560 064. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. V.F. KUMBAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1;
SRI. C. SHANKARA REDDY, ADVOCATE FOR R2;
APPEAL AS AGAINST R3 AND R4 STANDS DISMISSED VIDE
ORDER DATED 17.01.2025)
THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 17.3.2016 PASSED IN MVC NO.6349/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE 7TH ADDITIONAL SMALL CAUSES JUDGE, 32ND ACMM, MEMBER, MACT-3, BENGALURU, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:8536 MFA No. 4740 of 2016 ORAL JUDGMENT No representation on appellant's side on call.
Sri. V.F.Kumbar, learned counsel for respondent No.1 is present.
There was no representation on appellant's side even on 17.01.2025 and 18.02.2025. Though the matter is listed on this day under the caption for dismissal, yet there is no representation. Therefore, the appeal stands dismissed for non prosecution. Sd/- (DR.CHILLAKUR SUMALATHA) JUDGE VS List No.: 1 Sl No.: 56 CT: BHK