Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27883 (RAJ)

JAYPRAKASH S/O JAGDISH SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/10413/2025 · 2025-08-20

Ashok Kumar Jain

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:32828] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 10413/2025 Jayprakash S/o Jagdish Singh, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Badapura, Jakhoda, Police Station Mandrayal, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (Presently Confined In Jail At Karauli, District Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rahul Sharma & Ms. Chanchal for Mr. Rajneesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 20/08/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Jayprakash S/o Jagdish Singh in FIR No. 140/2024 dated 21.09.2024 registered at P.S. Mandrayal District - Karauli whereby the applicant- accused was charged under Sections 115(2), 126(2), 352, 125 of BNS. 2. The applicant was arrested and is in judicial custody since his arrest. The Court below has dismissed the bail application. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submitted that the injured is Mausi and neighbour of present petitioner. He further submitted that [2025:RJ-JP:32828] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-10413/2025] when there was a scuffle between injured Bhuri Devi and her daughter-in-law Shivani then this petitioner accused tried to mediate between them and as a result of provocation this petitioner has used stick so as to rescue them but injured Bhuri Devi has sustained some injuries. He further submitted that the medical jurist has opined that one injury is grievous but same is not dangerous to life. He further submitted that there is no criminal antecedent and present petitioner accused is in custody since 03.08.2025. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor and he submitted report received from P.S. Mandrayal, District Karauli. 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record along with case diary 6. On the basis of report registered by injured Bhuri Devi on 21.09.2024 about incident of 20.09.2024. The matter is investigated and during investigation injury report of Bhuri Devi is prepared and as per report she has sustained four injuries and injury no.3 is grievous but caused by blunt object. Further, X-ray report suggests that there is a hairline fracture on occipital bone of Bhuri Devi. The petitioner accused is in custody since 03.08.2025 and there is no criminal antecedent against petitioner accused. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, [2025:RJ-JP:32828] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-10413/2025] looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicants-accused Jayprakash S/o Jagdish Singh , is hereby allowed and ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J CHETNA BEHRANI /269