Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2788 (ALL)

RAHUL ALIAS RAKESH v. STATE OF U.P. AND ANOTHER

CRLA/9482/2025 · 2026-05-13

Madan Pal Singh

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL APPEAL No. - 9482 of 2025 Court No. - 51 HON'BLE MADAN PAL SINGH, J. 1. Counter affidavit filed on behalf of the State and the rejoinder affidavit filed on behalf of the appellant to the counter affidavit filed on behalf of opposite party no.2 in the Court today are taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for appellant, learned counsel for opposite party no.2 and learned AGA for the State-respondent. 3. By means of the present criminal appeal under Section 14A-1 of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989, the appellant has prayed for quashing of the charge-sheet dated 14th May, 2025, cognizance/summoning order dated 22nd July, 2025 as well as entire proceedings of Sessions Case No. 1295 of 2025 (State Vs. Rahul @ Rakesh & Another) arising out of Case Crime No. 194 of 2025 under Sections 115 (2), 352, 351 (2) and 118 (1) of B.N.S. and Sections 3 (1) (r) and 3 (1) (s) of S.C./S.T. Act, Police Station-Govardhan, District-Mathura, pending in the Court of Special Judge (S.C./S.T. Act), Maathura. 3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the appellant has submitted that he does not wish to press the merits of the case, rather he seeks liberty to file an appropriate application before the concerned trial court and a direction to the learned Trial Court to decide the bail application of the appellants in light of the judgment of Hon'ble Supreme Court in Satender Kumar Antil Vs. CBI, reported in (2022) 10 SCC 51. 4. Learned AGA for the State has not opposed the submissions made by learned counsel for the appellant. 5. In light of the law laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court regarding grant of bail to an accused, the appellant is granted liberty to file bail application before the concerned trial court. If the appellant surrenders before the trial Versus Counsel for Appellant(s) : Manish Kumar Datta, Ram Jatan Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Anjit Kumar, G.A. Rahul Alias Rakesh .....Appellant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) court and applies for bail within 20 days from today, the same shall be considered and decided by the trial court in accordance with law at the earliest, if possible on the same day. 6. For a period of 20 days or till the date of surrender of the appellant before the trial court, no coercive action shall be taken against the appellant. 7 . With the aforesaid observation, the present criminal appeal is disposed of. May 14, 2026 Sushil/- CRLA No. 9482 of 2025 2 (Madan Pal Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUSHIL KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad