Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:37452] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.13163/2025
1. Kalyan S/o Narayan Mali, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Todaganga, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dousa (Raj.)
2. Ramkhiladi S/o Moharpal Mali, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Todaganga, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dousa (Raj.)
3. Lala S/o Moharpal Mali, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Todaganga, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dousa (Raj.)
4. Hajari S/o Moharpal Mali, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Todaganga, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dousa (Raj.)
5. Meetha Lal S/o Moharpal Mali, Aged About 50 Years, R/o Todaganga, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dousa (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus
1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary Of The Revenue Department, Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. The District Collector, Colectrate Building, Dousa (Raj.). 3. The Sub Division Magistrate, Lalsot, District Dous (Raj.). 4. The Tehsildar, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dousa (Raj.). 5. Mohanya S/o Mulya Mali, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Todaganga, Tehsil Lalsot, District Dousa (Raj.). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Girraj Prasad Gadhwal JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 15/09/2025
1. By way of filing this writ petition, a prayer has been made for issuing directions to the respondents to not to make gravel road on the agricultural land of the petitioners. 2. It appears that certain civil and revenue disputes are lying pending between the parties before the Court of Additional
[2025:RJ-JP:37452] (2 of 2) [CW-13163/2025] Collector/Sub-Divisional Magistrate, wherein certain interim orders have been passed directing the parties to maintain status-quo. It also appears that before approaching this court by way of filing this writ petition, a notice for demand of justice has not been served by the petitioners and the petitioners are hereby seeking a writ of mandamus against the respondents. 3. In the considered opinion of this Court, in the absence of issuing any notice for demand of justice, a writ of mandamus cannot be issued and such like writ petition is not maintainable. 4. On this count alone, the instant writ petition stands disposed of granting liberty to the petitioners to issue notice for demand of justice to the respondent for redressal of their grievances. 5. In case, any such notice is served by the petitioners in the office of the respondents, it is expected from the respondents to look into the same and decide it strictly in accordance with law. 6. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of.
(ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/10