Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27863 (RAJ)

PRADEEP SHARMA S/O SHRI RAMSWAROOP SHARMA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SAW/1010/2025 · 2025-08-29

Sanjeet Purohit, Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:34763-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Special Appeal Writ No. 1010/2025 in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9019/2020 1. Pradeep Sharma S/o Shri Ramswaroop Sharma, Aged About 39 Years, R/o P.no. 18-A, 10-B Vistar, Triveni Nagar, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. Mahendra Kumar Saini S/o Shivpal Saini, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Plot No. 20, Sagar Vihar Colony, Behind Milan Cinema, Delhi Bye Pass Road, Distt. Jaipur (Raj.) ----Appellants Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Medical And Health Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 2. The Director, Department Of Medical And Health Department, Govt. Of Rajasthan. Swasthan Bhawan, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. The Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer Through Its Secretary. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : Mr. Akshit Gupta For Respondent(s) : Ms. Dhriti Laddha HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEET PUROHIT Order 29/08/2025 1. This appeal has been preferred on behalf of the appellants assailing the order dated 11.07.2025 passed by learned Single Judge in S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9019/2020, whereby the application filed for seeking interim relief to participate in the interview, was dismissed. [2025:RJ-JP:34763-DB] (2 of 2) [SAW-1010/2025] 2. As has come on record, in the order, we find that the appellants could not succeed in the written examination and their names did not find place in the final result dated 13.03.2020. 3. The Court has passed an order directing that the recruitment process shall be subject to the final decision of the writ petition. In view thereto, learned Single Judge has rejected the prayer made by the appellants to participate in the interview process. 4. We do not find any reason to differ from the order passed by learned Single Judge in the matter. 5. In view thereof, the instant special appeal writ is dismissed. 6. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (SANJEET PUROHIT),J (SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA),J SAHIL SONI /257