AMRAT LAL S/O PARSARAM v. DURGA DEVI W/O LATE PRAHLAD
CMA/4349/2019 · 2025-01-02
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27862 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27862 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:214] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Miscellaneous Appeal No. 4349/2019 Amrat Lal S/o Parsaram, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Borkhandi, Tehsil Pipalu, District Tonk (Raj.). ----Appellant Versus
1. Durga Devi W/o Late Prahlad, Aged About 58 Years, R/o Borkhandi, Tehsil Pipalu, District Tonk (Raj.).
2. Devkaran S/o Prahlad, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Borkhandi, Tehsil Pipalu, District Tonk (Raj.).
3. Suresh S/o Prahlad, Aged About 18 Years, R/o Borkhandi, Tehsil Pipalu, District Tonk (Raj.).
4. Norati D/o Prahlad, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Borkhandi, Tehsil Pipalu, District Tonk (Raj.).
5. Mohani D/o Prahlad, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Borkhandi, Tehsil Pipalu, District Tonk (Raj.).
6. Rampyari D/o Prahlad, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Borkhandi, Tehsil Pipalu, District Tonk (Raj.).
7. Lalaram S/o Prahlad, Aged About 36 Years, R/o Gandhi Park, Police Station Kotawali, Tonk, District Tonk (Raj.)
8. United India Insurance Company Limited, Regional Office C-97, Kalyan Villa, Subhash Marg, C-Scheme, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Appellant(s) : None. For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 02/01/2025
1. None present for the appellant.
2. It appears that appellant is not interested in pursuing the matter.
[2025:RJ-JP:214] (2 of 2) [CMA-4349/2019]
3. Hence, the matter is dismissed as non-prosecution. Misc. application, if any, stands disposed of.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J Arun/13