[2025:RJ-JP:37456] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12469/2025 M/s Tuntun Kumar Singh, Having Registered Office At Hathi Stand, Amer Mahal, Jaipur Through Sole Proprietor Tuntun Kumar Singh, S/o Balinder Singh, Aged About 49 Years, R/o C- 58, Gali No.1, Ambedkar Palace, Baprola, Paschim Delhi-110043. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Department Of Archaeology And Museum, Jaipur 2. The Director, Department Of Archaeology And Museum, Albert Hall, Ramniwas Bagh, Jaipur-302004. 3. The Superintendent, Department Of Archaeology And Museum, Amber Mahal, Jaipur-302028. 4. The Station House Officer, Police Station Amber, Dist. Jaipur City (North). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anirudh Tyagi with Mr. Saurabh Vaishnav For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aayush Mall, Dy. G. C. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 15/09/2025 1. Present petition is filed with the following prayers:- “i) The instant petition for writ may kindly be ordered to be allowed and a writ, order or direction in the appropriate nature may kindly be issued in favour of the jumble petitioner institute; ii) The respondents may kindly be directed to direct the jeep union to interfere in the parking business of the petitioner and to not induce the buses to park at unauthorized parking spaces other than the parking space operated by the petitioner; iii) The petitioner prays to the Hon’ble High Court to kindly direct the Respondents to not charge the 10% increased deposition amount for operating the parking space Mavatha South at Amber Fort till the dispute with the jeep union in resolved; [2025:RJ-JP:37456] (2 of 2) [CW-12469/2025] iv) The petitioner prays for quashing ans setting aside office order bearing No. 2022/1918 dated 11/02/2025 issued by the Respondent No. 2 against the petitioner; v) In the alternative the petitioner prays that the Respondents be directed to decide the Legal Notice/Representation dated 06/08/2025 sent by the petitioner to the Respondents; vi) Any other order which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may also be passed in favour of the petitioner; vii) The Cost of the present writ petition may kindly be awarded in favour of the humble petitioner.” 2. Present matter pertains to allotment of parking space qua Mavatha (South) at Amber Fort, Amber. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner is under presumption and assumption that same kind of order can passed as per order dated 11.02.2025 (Annexure-8) i.e. qua the Hathi stand parking, as therein the petitioner was debarred for a period of three years. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents has raised preliminary objection that qua the Mavatha South parking at Amber Fort, Amber, as there is no cause of action being substantially placed on record. It is further submitted that present matter pertains to contractual dispute which cannot be entertained in writ jurisdiction. 5. Considering the forgoing facts and circumstances, this Court is not inclined to interfere in the present matter as same is pre-mature at this stage. 6. Accordingly, present petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, stands disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja/218