Research › Search › Judgment
High Court of Karnataka · body
2025 DAILYLAW 2785 (KAR)
RAMAPPA S/O GOVINDAPPA MASALI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/100141/2025 · 2025-02-20
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2785 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2785 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3489 WP No. 100141 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 20TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA
WRIT PETITION NO. 100141 OF 2025 (CS-EL/M)
BETWEEN:
1. RAMAPPA S/O GOVINDAPPA MASALI AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO.30)
2. SHANTAVVA W/O. RAMAPPA MASALI AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO.31)
3. LAKSHAMAPPA S/O. RAMAPPA MASALI AGE:50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO.33)
ABOVE ALL ARE R/O: BEERANAKOPPA, TQ: BYADAGI, DIST: HAVERI -581106. 4. BASANAGOUDA S/O GURUNAGOUDA PATIL
AGE:35 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO.52)
5. BASAVARAJ S/O. SHIVAPUTRAPPA KONANAVAR AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE (SL. NO.56)
6. SHIVANANDAPPA S/O.MARADEPPA BANNIHATTI
Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3489 WP No. 100141 of 2025
AGE: 54 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 58)
7. GUDDAPPA S/O. SANNIGAPPA ONTIAADIN AGE: 57 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 59)
ABOVE ALL ARE R/O: CHIKKANAJI, TQ: BYADAGI, DIST: HAVERI -581106. 8. SHIVAPPA S/O MAYAPPA KODHADA AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 69)
9. SHIDDAPPA S/O. AJJAPPA KOPPADA
AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO.74)
10. BASAVARAJ S/O. KALYANAPPA UKKUND AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTUR (SL NO. 78)
11. MAHADEVAPPA S/O. NINGAPPA GORAVAR AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 87)
ABOVE ALL ARE R/O: DHULIKOPPA, TQ: BYADAGI, DIST: HAVERI -581106. 12. HANUMANTAPPA S/O. MOOKAPPA MUTTALLI AGE: 61 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL NO. 119)
13. MOOKANAGOUDA S/O. BASANAGOUDA LINGADALLI AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3489 WP No. 100141 of 2025
(SL. NO. 127)
14. RAMESH S/O. BASAPPA SHIGIHALLI AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 130)
15. SHIVARAYAPPA S/O. GUDDAPPA SHETASANADI AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 131)
16. MANJUNAGOUDA S/O. BASAVANAGOUDA LINGANGOUDRA AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 135)
17. MALLESHAPPA S/O. CHANNABASAPPA KOPPAD
AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO.141)
18. IRAPPA S/O. AJJAPPA KAVALI AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 149)
19. MALLAPPA S/O. AJJAPPA KAVALI
AGE: 55 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 150)
20. MANJAPPA S/O. AJJAPPA KAVALI AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL NO. 152)
ABOVE ALL ARE R/O: HIREANAJI, TQ: BYADAGI, DIST: HAVERI -581106. 21. SHIVAPUTRAPPA S/O. TIRAKAPPA ANGADI AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
- 4 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3489 WP No. 100141 of 2025
(SL. NO. 162)
22. MOOKAPPA S/O. FAKKIRAPPA TIPPANAYKAR AGE: 35 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO.
164)
23. RUDRAPPA S/O. FAKKIRAPPA HASABI AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 165)
24. KENCHAPPA S/O. BASAPPA ADHIVER AGE: 60 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 167)
25. RAAJESAB S/O. PEERSAB KOODIHALLI AGE: 65 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 169)
26. KALLAPPA S/O. SHIVAPPA DANEGONDAR AGE: 40 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 171)
27. RAMAPPA S/O. BASAPPA ARALIKATTI AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 173)
28. PARAMESHWARAPPA S/O. HANUMAPPA JADATARI AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 197)
29. MALATESH S/O. KARIYAPPA HOSALLI AGE: 20 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 210)
30. ALLABAKSH S/O. MARDANSAB BAASUR AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE,
- 5 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3489 WP No. 100141 of 2025
(SL. NO. 215)
31. IKBALAHMAD S/O MARDANSAB BAASUR AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 216)
32. NOORAHMAD S/O. MARDANSAB BAASUR AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 217)
33. MALATESH S/O. NAGAPPA HOSALLI AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 219)
34. HANUMANTAPPA S/O. MALAKAPPA KAARAGI AGE: 24 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 220)
35. MOUNESH S/O. BASAVARAJ KAMMAR AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO.237)
36. SURESH S/O. BASAVARAJ KAMMAR AGE: 22 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO .238)
37. CHANDRU S/O. BASAVARAJ KAMMAR AGE: 25 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 239)
38. GUDADESH S/O. NEELAPPA MOTEBENNUR AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO .241)
39. MALLESHAPPA S/O NEELAPPA MOTEBENNUR AGE: 26 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO. 242)
- 6 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3489 WP No. 100141 of 2025
40. IRAPPA S/O HAALAPPA JIGALIKOPPA AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO .244)
41. CHANNABASAPPA S/O RAMAPPA SHINGRI AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO .247)
42. RATNNAVVA W/O RAMAPPA SHINGRI AGE: 58 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO .248)
ABOVE ALL ARE R/O: MUTTURU, TQ: BYADAGI, DIST: HAVERI -581106. 43. VEERAYYA S/O BASAYYA HIREMATH AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO.270)
44. NAGAPPA S/O GUDDAPPA OLEKAR AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL. NO.274)
45. VEERAYYA S/O VEERABHADRAYYA HERIMATH AGE: 39 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, (SL.
NO.293)
ABOVE ALL ARE R/O: TUMARIKOPPA, TQ: BYADAGI, DIST: HAVERI -581106. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI S.S. SAJJAN, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY
- 7 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3489 WP No. 100141 of 2025
DEPARTMENT OF CO- OPERATION, MS BUILDING, BENGALURU- 580001. 2. THE STATE CO- OPERATIVE ELECTION AUTHORITY 3RD FLOOR, ‘A’ BLOCK SHANTI NAGAR, T. T. M. C., BUILDING BENGALURU – 560002. REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER. 3. THE ELECTION OFFICER / DEPUTY REGISTRAR, OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, HAVERI, DIST: HAVERI–581110. 4. THE RETURNING OFFICER, BYADGI TALUK PRATHAMIKA SAHAKAR KRUSHI MATTU GRAMEENA ABHIVRUDDI BANK, LTD., AND CO-OPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT OFFICER BYADGI, TQ: BYADGI, DIST: HAVERI -581106. 5. THE MANAGER/CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER, BYADGI TALUK PRATHAMIKA SAHAKAR KRUSHI MATTU GRAMEENA ABHIVRUDDI BANK, LTD., TQ: BYADGI, DIST: HAVERI -581106. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTHILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1 & R3, SRI G. V. BHARAMAGOUDAR, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R4, SRI S. N. BANAKAR, ADVOCATE FOR R5)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA IS PRAYING TO A) TO ISSUE A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS NO. 3 TO 5 TO INCLUDE THE NAMES OF THE PETITIONERS IN THE FINAL ELIGIBLE BORROWER VOTER LIST AND PERMIT THE PETITIONERS TO CAST THEIR VOTE IN THE
- 8 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3489 WP No. 100141 of 2025
ELECTION TO THE COMMITTEE OF THE MANAGEMENT OF THE 5TH RESPONDENT BANK SCHEDULED TO BE HELD ON 11/01/2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-A IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. B) TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENTS NO.4 TO DECLARE THE ELECTION RESULTS AFTER COMPLETION OF THE ELECTION PROCESS BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. C) TO ISSUE ANY OTHER ORDER, DIRECTIONS AS DEEMS FIT IN THE FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the parties in unison would submit that, the issue in the lis stands covered by judgment rendered by Coordinate Bench of this Court in W.P. No.8502/2022 C/w. W.P. No.8477/2022,
disposed off on 7th June 2022. The Coordinate Bench of this Court held as follows:
“8. In the light of these rival submissions, the question for consideration is: Whether these writ petitions must be
disposed of directing the Returning Officer [the fourth respondent and sixth respondents in the
- 9 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3489 WP No. 100141 of 2025
respective petitions to announce the results of the elections held on 23.04.2022 including the votes cast by the petitioners.
9. The provisions of Rule 13-D (2-A) of the Rules read as hereunder: (3) The Election Officer shall take steps for publication of voters list in the following manner, namely:- (a) for publication of draft eligible electoral list, a list of defaulters, a list of members whose repayment falls due, before the election date clear fifty days; (b) for calling objections, if any, calling upon the defaulter members to repay the amounts due to the co-operative societies on or before thirty clear days prior to the date of election; (c) the scrutiny and verification of the voters list after payment by defaulters etc., clear twenty days before the ate of election. (d) for publication of final eligible voters list before fifteen clear days prior to the date of election. The underlining is by this Court.
10. These provisions do not leave any room for doubt that an excluded member, with the publication of the Draft Eligible Electoral List, must have an opportunity by way of an individual notice to file objections on exclusion from the Electoral List. It must be shown that the concerned Chief Executive has prepared and sent notice to the affected members. The Public Notice dated 8.11.20211 does not meet these requirements. In
1 This Public Notice reads as follows:
¸ÀAWÀzÀ ¨ÉʯÁ wzÀÄÝ¥Àr DzÉñÀ ¸ÀASÉå: r Dgï ªÉÊ: Dgï.J¸ï.Dgï.JA.J.©.¹.Dgï- 16/2018- 19 ¢£ÁAPÀ 16.11.2018 gÀAvÉ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À G¥À¤§AzsÀPÀgÀÄ, ªÀÄAqÀå f¯Éè, ªÀÄAqÀågÀªÀgÀÄ
- 10 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3489 WP No. 100141 of 2025
fact, it is admitted on behalf of the respondents that there are deficiencies in the preparation of the Final Electoral Roll after the publication of the Draft Eligible Electoral List, and the petitioners have not been issued with individual notices.
11. The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Shri Sant Sadguru Janardan Swami (Moingiri Maharaj) Sahakari Dugha Utpadak Sanstha and Another v. State of Maharashtra and Others supra has held as follows: ‘7. A perusal of the Rules discloses that the preparation of provisional list of voters, filing of objection against the provisional list of voters,
consideration of the objection by the Collector and finalising the list of voters, all occur in the Rules which cover the entire process of the election. The Rules framed for election of specified societies are complete code in itself providing for the entire process of election beginning from the stage of preparation of the provisional voters list, decision on the objection by the Collector, finalisation of electoral rolls, holding of election and declaration of result of the election. In view of the scheme of
¨ÉʯÁ wzÀÄݪÀrAiÀÄ£ÀÄß D£ÀÄªÉÆÃ¢¹ £ÉÆAzÁ¬Ä¹gÀÄvÁÛgÉ. CzÀgÀAvÉ '©' vÀgÀUÀw gÉÊvÀ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ µÉÃj£À ªÀÄÄR¨É¯É gÀÆ.1000.00 UÀ¼ÀÄ ªÀÄvÀÄÛ µÉÃgÀÄ ±ÀÄ®ÌzÀ ¨Á§Ä gÀÆ.100.00 UÀ¼ÀÄ DVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. ªÀiÁ£Àå '©' vÀgÀUÀw ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÁzÀ vÀªÀÄä µÉÃgÀÄ ªÉƧ®UÀÄ gÀÆ.500.00UÀ¼ÀÄ EzÀÄÝ ¨ÁQ µÉÃgÀÄ ªÉƧ®UÀÄ gÀÆ.500.00UÀ¼ÀÄ PÀrªÉÄ EgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. EzÀgÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ ¨ÁQ EgÀĪÀ µÉÃgÀÄ ±ÀÄ®Ì gÀÆ.90.00UÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÉÃj MlÄÖ gÀÆ590,00UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¥ÁªÀw¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ ªÀiÁ£Àå '©' vÀgÀUÀw PÉ®ªÀÅ ¸ÀzÀ¸ÀågÀ µÉÃgÀÄ ªÉƧ®UÀÄ gÀÆ.100.00UÀ¼ÀÄ EzÀÄÝ. ¨ÁQ µÉÃgÀÄ ªÉƧ®UÀÄ gÀÆ900.00UÀ¼ÀÄ PÀrªÉÄ EgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. EzÀgÀ eÉÆvÉUÉ ¨ÁQ EgÀĪÀ µÉÃgÀÄ ¸ÀÄ®Ì gÀÆ 100.00UÀ¼ÀÄ ¸ÉÃj MlÄÖ gÀÆ 1000.00UÀ¼À£ÀÄß ¢£ÁAPÀ:11.12.2021 gÉÆ¼ÀUÉ ¸ÀAWÀPÉÌ ¥ÁªÀw¸ÀĪÀAvÉ F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ vÀªÀÄUÉ w½¹zÉ. ªÀÄÄAzÀĪÀjzÀÄ EzÀ®èzÉ PÀ£ÁðlPÀ ¸ÀºÀPÁgÀ ¸ÀAWÀUÀ¼À C¢ü¤AiÀÄ£ÀÄ 1959gÀ ¥ÀæPÀgÀt 20(2) (J4) ºÁUÀÆ (J5)gÀrAiÀİè£À CªÀPÁ±ÀUÀ¼ÀAvÉAiÀÄÆ CºÀðvÉAiÀÄÆ ºÉÆA¢gÀ¨ÉÃPÁVgÀÄvÀÛzÉ. vÀ¦àzÀ°è ªÀÄÄAzÉ d£ÀªÀj 2022gÀ ªÀiÁºÉAiÀÄ°è £ÀqÉAiÀİgÀĪÀ DqÀ½vÀ ªÀÄAqÀ° ZÀÄ£ÁªÀuÉAiÀÄ°è ªÀÄvÀ ZÀ¯Á¬Ä¸À®Ä ºÁUÀÆ ¸Àà¢üð¸À®Ä CªÀPÁ±À«gÀĪÀÅ¢®è JA§ «µÀAiÀĪÀ£ÀÄß F ªÀÄÆ®PÀ vÀªÀÄUÉ w½¸À¯ÁVzÉ. - 11 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3489 WP No. 100141 of 2025
the Act and Rules, the preparation of voters' list must be held to be part of the election process for constituting managing committee of a specified society. 12. In view of our finding that preparation of the electoral roll is being an intermediate stage in the process of election of the managing committee of a specified society and the election process having been set in motion, it is well settled that the High Court should not stay the continuation of the election process even though there may be some alleged illegality or breach of rules while preparing the electoral roll. It is not disputed that the election in question has already been held and the result thereof has been stayed by an order of this Court, and once the result of the election is declared, it would be open to the appellant to challenge the election of returned candidate, if aggrieved, by means of an election petition before the election tribunal. 12. It follows from this decision that the adjudication of all questions must be as provided under Section 70(2) of the Co-operative Societies Act2.
However, in the present case the
2 70. Disputes which may be referred to Registrar for decision.- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, if any dispute touching the constitution, management, or the business of a co-operative society arises,— (a) xxxxxxxxx (2). For the purposes of sub-section (1), the following shall be deemed to be disputes touching the constitution, management or the business of a co-operative society, namely:— (a). XXXXXXXXXXX (b). XXXXXXXXXXXXX (c). any dispute arising in connection with the election of a President, Vice- president, Chairman, Vice-chairman,
- 12 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3489 WP No. 100141 of 2025
respondents admit that there are deficiencies in finalization of Final Electoral List. The petitioners are admittedly not issued with individual notice as required under the provisions of Rule13-D (2-A) of the Co-operative Societies Rules; the petitioners have now cast their votes in the elections on 23.04.2022; the petitioners are not given the opportunity to show cause against the allegations that they have created documents. The respondents, despite admitting deficiencies in finalisation of the Final Electoral List, want to invoke the rule of alternative remedy. This Court is of the considered view that, in the peculiarities of this case, the writ petitions should be disposed of with directions to the concerned respondent to announce results counting even the votes cast by the petitioners and with liberty to all the concerned to avail remedy under Section 70(2) of the Act if aggrieved by the results. If such remedy is availed raising a dispute, exclusion of votes of those petitioners who are guilty of fraud can also be considered based on the material that will be placed on record. Therefore, writ petitions are disposed of calling upon the Returning Officer [the fourth respondent/sixth respondent in the respective petitions] to announce the result forthwith including the votes cast by the petitioners in both the petitions. All the contentions are left open for
consideration in appropriate proceedings, if commenced.”
2.
Learned counsel would submit that, if the same
order is passed, it would suffice in this case also.
Secretary, Treasurer or Member of Committee of the society.
- 13 -
NC: 2025:KHC-D:3489 WP No. 100141 of 2025
3. In that light, the writ petition is disposed calling upon the respondent – Returning Officer to announce the result forthwith including the votes cast by the petitioners. All the contentions are left open for consideration in appropriate proceedings, if commenced.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
KGK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 106