SMT. SMT. KAMLESH SANGHI W/O SHRI AMOLAK CHAND SANGHI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
HC/301/2025 · 2025-09-08
Bhuwan Goyal, Inderjeet Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27835 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27835 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:35780-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Habeas Corpus Petition No. 301/2025 Smt. Kamlesh Sanghi W/o Shri Amolak Chand Sanghi, Aged About 90 Years, R/o E-131, Gulmohar Garden, Vatika, Sanganer, Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Home Department, Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director General Of Police, Rajasthan, Jaipur.
3. Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur Mahanagar, Police Commissionrate, M.i. Road, Jaipur
4. Deputy Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur City (East)
5. S.h.o., Police Station Sanganer Sadar, Jaipur City (East)
6. Sdm Jaipur-Ii, Sanganer, Jaipur
7. Sdm Jaipur-I, Jaipur.
8. Additional Director General Of Police, Anti Human Trafficking Unit, Jaipur
9. Rakesh Sanghi S/o Shri Amolak Chand Sanghi, R/o Plot No. 676, Near Moti Doongri Police Station, Adarsh Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sudhir Jain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. Aman Kumar, AAAG Mr. Anil Jaiman, CI-SHO, Sanganer Sadar, District Jaipur HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL
Order 08/09/2025
1. This habeas corpus petition has been filed by the petitioner with regard to illegal detention of the corpus-her husband.
[2025:RJ-JP:35780-DB] (2 of 2) [HC-301/2025]
2.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has shown the CCTV footage to the Court today and submits that respondent No.9 has taken forcefully the corpus-his father from the house of the petitioner.
3. Counsel for the petitioner tried to make out submissions with regard to civil dispute pending between the parties. We are not inclined to go into the merits of civil dispute case.
4. Today, the concerned Police Officer has produced the corpus before us. The corpus is 90 years old aged person and this fact has been confirmed by counsel for the petitioner as well as learned GA-cum-AAG.
5. We have interacted with the corpus and he firmly stated before us that he is not in any illegal detention. He further stated that he is willingly residing with his own son namely Rakesh Sanghi who is also present in the Court and wants to go with respondent No.9 (his son).
6. Considering the statement made by the corpus before us, the fact that he is 90 years old aged person, we set the corpus at liberty to go and live at the place of his own choice. The concerned SHO shall ensure that no harm should be caused by anyone to the corpus while going with his son to the place of his own choice.
7. Accordingly, the habeas corpus petition is dismissed.
(BHUWAN GOYAL),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J PAYAL DHAWAN /16