LINGALA DHAWAN KUMAR v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/24316/2022 · 2025-10-06
B Krishna Mohan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27835 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27835 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010395532022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 24316/2022 Between:
1. LINGALA DHAWAN KUMAR, S/O. MUSAIALAH, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O.D. NO. 10/181/B , KOMEPADU VILLAGE, VIJANAMPADU,VATTICHERUKURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. RAYAPUDI MARY, , W/O. DAVID RAJU, AGED 42 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 10/181/A KORNEPADU VILLAGE, VIJANAMPADU, VATTICHERUKURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
3. KURAPATI RAMADEVI, W/O. LATE KISHORE, AGED 45 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 13/180/B KORNEPADU VILLAGE, VIJANAMPADU, VATTICHERUKURUMANADAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY,
REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT,
SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH.
3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, 0/O. COLLECTORATE, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2 HBKM,J W.P.No.24316 of 2022
4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, , GUNTUR REVENUE DIVISION, GUNTUR CITY, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
5. THE TAHSILDAR, VATTICHERUKURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
6. VIJANAMPADU GRAMA PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, VINJANAMPADU VILLAGE, VATTICHERUKURU MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SAMUEL GANGOLU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. VENKATA REDDY GAJJALA SC FOR ZPP, MPP, AND GRAM PANCHAYAT
2. GP FOR REVENUE
3. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV
3 HBKM,J W.P.No.24316 of 2022
The Court made the following Order:
The learned counsel for the petitioners seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this writ petition, for which, he addressed a letter dated 06.10.2025 to the Registrar (Judicial).
2. Permission is accorded.
3. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs.
As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN
07.10.2025 PGT