APHC010395122002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY, THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 13743/2002 Between: 1. A.VENKATESWARA RAO, ANNAVARAM DEVASTHAN, EG, S/O. SURI BABU, CARPENTER, (ON CONSOLIDATED BASIS) ANNAVARAM DEVASTHANAM, E. G. DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE COMMR FOR ENDOWMENTS HYD, GOVT. OF A.P., HYDERABAD. 2. SRI VEERA VENKATA SATYANRAYANA SWAMY SRI DEVASTHANAM, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, ANNAVARAM, E. G. DIST. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the impugned action of the respondents in not regularising the service of the petitioner inspite of Trust Board resolutions and proceedings addressed by the 2nd respondent in Rc.No.A1/1277/96, dated 10.6.1996 and Rc No. A1/1277/96, dated 25/6/2000 by further declaring that the 2nd respondent need not be get any permission from the 1st respondent in view of section 35 of the A.P., Endowment Act and consequently direct the respondents to regularise the service of the petitioner in view of the proceedings R. C No. A1/1277/96, dated 10-6-1996 and Rc.No.A1/ 1277 /96 dated 25/6/2000 on the file of the 2nd respondent with all attendant Benefits and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 17109 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to terminate the service of the petitioner pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2010(WVMP 3899 OF 2010 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim orders dated 29-07-2002 passed in W.P.M.P. No. 17109 of 2002 in W.P. No. 13743 of 2002. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G V SHIVAJI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. K MADHAVA REDDY (SC FOR ENDOWMENTS AR) 2. V T M PRASAD 3. KOTESWARA RAO KAPPERA SC For Endowments The Court made the following order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the writ petitioner is not in touch with him since so many years and could not get instructions from him. 2. The matter is of the year 2002. The submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the writ petitioner is not in touch with him shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter. 2. In view of the above, this Writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. If at all the petitioner feels that cause in this writ petition survives, he can move an appropriate application. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI BRS