Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010014992025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/233/2025 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO. LTD. A COMPANY REGISTERED UNDER THE COMPANIES ACT, 1985, REP. BY REGIONAL MANAGER, G.S. ROAD, GUWAHATI-7. VERSUS ACHAN ALI AND 6 ORS S/O. LT.SONAULLA SHEIKH. 2:MAYFUL NESSA W/O. ACHAN ALI BOTH ARE R/O. VILL. CHATPARA P/O. JOGIGHOPA P/S. JOGIGHOPA DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-783382. 3:THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. BONGAIGAON DIVISON BONGAIGAON P/O. JOGIGHOPA P/S. JOGIGHOPA DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-783380. 4:NANHOO YADAV S/O. RAMPRIT C/O. SANJAY KUMAR CHIRIPAL PLOT NO. 24 SPECTRUM PROJECT-1 Page No.# 2/4 WEST 5TH EXT. GHANDI NAGAR POST BERHAMPUR GANJAN ODHISHA-760001. 5:SUSHIL KUMAR CHOUDHURY S/O. SHREE RAM CHOUDHURY R/O. HADHIA KALA P/O. HASHIA KALA P/S. REOTI DIST. BALLIA UTTAR PRADESH-277209. 6:ANAR HUSSAIN S/O. ATOWAR HUSSAIN R/O. VILL. DOLONI BEEL P/O. BALAPARA P/S. JOGIGHOPA DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-783388 7:MEHER ZAMAL S/O. ABU BAKKAR SIDDIQUE R/O. VILL. KABAITARY PART-V P/O. JOGIGHOPA P/S. JOGIGHOPA DIST. BONGAIGAON ASSAM PIN-78338 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. A ACHARYA, MRS S ACHARYA,MRS B ACHARYA Advocate for the Respondent : MRS. D DAS BARMAN (R-3), MS J AKTAR(R-1,2),MR A K DAS (R-1,2),MR. M KHAN(R-1,2) Linked Case : MAC App./886/2025 (FilingNumber) THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD REP BY THE REGIONAL MANAGER GUWAHATI VERSUS ACHAN ALI AND ORS BONGAIGAON Page No.# 3/4 2:MAYFUL NESSA BONGAIGAON 3:THE DIVISIONAL MANAGER THE NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD BONGAIGAON 4:NANHOO YADAV ODISHA 5:SUSHIL KUMAR CHOUDHURY UTTAR PRADESH 6:ANAR HUSSAIN BONGAIGAON 7:MEHER ZAMAL BONGAIGAON ------------ Advocate for : AYUSMAN ACHARYA Advocate for : appearing for ACHAN ALI AND ORS BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHIVJYOTI SAIKIA ORDER Date : 26.11.2025 Heard the learned counsel Mr. A. Acharya appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. M. Khan, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 as well as Mrs. D.D. Barman, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent No. 3. 2. This is an application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963 praying for condonation of 51 days of delay in preferring the connected MAC Appeal. 3. Ms. Barman as well as Mr. Khan have submitted that they have no objection if the delay is condoned. 4. Therefore, the delay stands condoned. 5. The connected MAC Appeal shall be registered and listed for admission hearing. The IA stands disposed of accordingly. Page No.# 4/4 JUDGE Comparing Assistant