APHC010394972002 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 25042/2002 Between: 1. K.ADINARAYANA MURTHY S/O VEERABADRA RAO, S/OVEERABADRA RAO. EMPLOYEE OF KGB R/O.VISAKHAPATNAM. 2. Y.POTARAJU,, S/O.LATE NANCHARAIAH. EMPLOYEE OF KGB R/O.VISAKHAPATNAM. 3. D.BRAMANANDA REDDY,, S/O.SATYANARAYANA REDDY. EMPLOYEE OF KGB R/O.VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE DIRECTOR/MANAGER KHADI GRAMODYOG BHAVAN, KHADI&VILLAGE COMMISSION. SRIHARI PLAZA, MAIN ROAD MAHARANIPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM-2 2. THE DIRECTOR MARKATINGKHADIVILLAGE INDUSTRIES, COMMISSION. 3RD IRLA ROAD, VILEPARLE(WEST), MUMBAI-56. 3. THE STATE DIRECTOR KHADI VILLAGE INDUSTRIES COMMISSION, STATE OFFICE. GANDHI BHAVAN IFLOOR, NAMPALLY, HYDERABAD. 4. THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER KHADI VILLAGE INDUSTRIES, COMMISSION 3RD IRLA ROAD, VILEPARLE(WEST), MUMBAI-56. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue order, Writ or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of Respondents in not regularizing the services of Petitioners transferring and relieving them vide letters dt.12-11- 2002 No.MKT/KGB/VIZ/SM/2001-2002-03 Ro.VSP/Dir.cell/2002 of Respondent no.1,contrary to the Policy of Govt.of India, Ministry of H.A.O.M.NO.75/55-Ests.(A), dt.24-3-1955,and without paying the arrears as illegal, arbitrary and consequently set aside the said orders and direct the Respondents to follow the G.O. H.A.O.M. NO.75/55-Ests.(A), dt./ 24-3-1955 and post the Petitioners in Home station and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2002(WPMP 31577 OF 2002 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned Order of transfer dt.12-11-2002 in letter No.MKT/KGB/VIZ/SM/2001-2002-03 of Resondent no.2 and reliving memo dt.25-11-2002 in letter no.Ro.VSP/Dir.cell/2002 of Respondent no. 1 pending disposal of the W.P. and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VENUGOPALA RAO PASNOORU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ABBURI PRASANNA LAKSHMI The Court made the following: ORDER: On 06.10.2021, 07.07.2025 and 31.07.2025, there was no representation for the petitioners and the matter was posted under the caption ‘for dismissal’. 2. Despite the matter being listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, today also, there is no representation for the petitioners. This shows that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the case. 3 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI Date: 21st August, 2025 RKS