Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27814 (KAR)

RAMESH .B. v. SRI. MURTHY

CRL.A/1717/2023 · 2025-02-12

Shivashankar Amarannavar

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:6184 CRL.A No. 1717 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 1717 OF 2023 BETWEEN: RAMESH B AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS C/O A.M. MANI NO.36, 1ST CROSS, 2ND MAIN T.G.LAYOUT, BSK 3RD STAGE ITTADADU, BANGALORE-85 …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VENKATA REDDY C.M, ADVOCATE - [ABSENT]) AND: SRI. MURTHY S/O ANJANEYA REDDY AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS RESIDING AT NO.95, 4TH CROSS THIMMARAYAGOWDA LAYOUT DATTATREYA ROAD BSK 3RD STAGE, ITTAMADU BANGALORE-85 …RESPONDENT THIS CRL.A. IS FILED U/S.378(4) CR.P.C PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE DISMISSAL ORDER AND PERMIT HIM TO LEAD EVIDENCE AND DIRECT THE LEARNED TRIAL JUDGE DISPOSE OFF THE MATTER ON MERITS IN C.C.NO.5784/2018 ON THE FILE OF THE XVI ADDITIONAL CHIEF METROPOLITAN MAGISTRATE AT BENGALURU. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: Digitally signed by HEMAVATHY GANGABYRAPPA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:6184 CRL.A No. 1717 of 2023 CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant is absent. There is no representation on the appellant’s side. The appeal is listed today for compliance of office objections for the fourth time. Inspite of giving sufficient opportunities, the office objections are not complied. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non compliance of office objections. Sd/- (SHIVASHANKAR AMARANNAVAR) JUDGE GH List No.: 1 Sl No.: 11