GIRIJAN PRIMARY MARKETING COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, v. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY PP AND ANOTHER,
CRLRC/419/2007 · 2025-07-01
Y Lakshmana Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27807 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27807 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010394972007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI WEDNESDAY,THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 419 OF 2007 Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C, aggrieved by the
Judgment dt. 13.11.2006 passed in CC.No. 152 of 2006 on the file of the Court of Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chintapalli. Between: Girijan Primary Marketing Cooperative Society, Chintapalli, Visakhapatnam District, rep by its Manager, C.Krishna Murthy, S/o. Venkata Subbaiah, aged 52 years ...Petitioner AND
1. State of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by Inspector of Police, Chintapalli P.S, Visakhapatnam District
2. Gunuru Kasi Visweswara Rao, S/o. Venkataramana @ Demudu, 48 years, R/o. Chodavaram Village, Visakhapatnam District. -Died 14/5/25 ...Respondents
Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri N Sridhar Reddy - no representation Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : Sri Banka Nageswara Rao Counsel for the Respondent No.1 iPublic Prosecutor The Court made the following Order: »" 4r % '
APHC010394972007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] WEDNESDAY, THE SECOND DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 419/2007 Between: 1.GIRIJAN PRIMARY MARKETING COOPERATIVE SOCIETY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, REP BY ITS MANAGER, C.KRISHNA MURTHY, S/0. VENKATA SUBBAIAH, AGED 52 YEARS, ...PETITIONER AND 1.STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH REP BY PP AND ANOTHER, DISTRICT, REP.BY INSPECTOR OF POLICE, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD. \ 2.GUNURU KASI VISWESWARA RAO, S/0. VENKATARAMANA @ DEMUDU, R/0. CHODAVARAM VILLAGE, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.NSRIDHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.BANKA NAGESWARA RAO
2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR 3.00 The Court made the following ORDER: No representation for the petitioner. Mr. B. Nageswara Rao, learned counsel for respondent No.2 submits that respondent No.2 died on 14.05.2025. Respondent No.2 was accused in
2. this case. This criminal revision case was filed challenging the judgement
2. acquitting the 2"'^ respondent for the charge under Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code (for short ‘the IPC’). 3. In view of the death of respondent No.2/Accused, nothing remains for further adjudication. 4. Therefore, this Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as abated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- V DIWAKAR DEPUTY REGISTRAR / //TRUE COPY// OO- SECTION OFFICER To,
1. The Judicial First Class Magistrate, Chintapalli, Visakhapatnam District
2. One CC to Sri. N Sridhar Reddy, Advocate [OPUC]
3. One CC to Sri. Banka Nageswara Rao, Advocate [OPUC]
4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravathi [OUT]
5. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh. 6.
Two CD Copies at Stu vna
HIGH COURT DATED:02/07/2025
ORDER CRLRC NO. 419 OF 2007 5 75 SEP 2025 a ^ Current Section OeSPATCV^?^^ DISMISSING THE CRL.RC AS ABATED V