Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27799 (PAT)

SANJAY YADAV v. The State of Bihar

CR. APP (SJ)/1269/2024 · 2025-09-17

Satyavrat Verma

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL APPEAL (SJ) No.1269 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-306 Year-2023 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran ====================================================== SANJAY YADAV SON OF LATE GANGA YADAV R/O-GAHIRI, GAMHARIYA, P.S.-NAUTAN, DISTT.-WEST CHAMPARAN ... ... Appellant/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. PRADEEP RAM SON OF LATE RAM LAL RAM R/O-GAHIRI, GAMHARIYA, P.S.-NAUTAN, DISTT.-WEST CHAMPARAN ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Appellant/s : Mr. Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Binay Krishna, Special PP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 3 17-09-2025 1. Heard learned counsel for the appellant, learned Spl. P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent no. 2, Mr. Sanjeev Kumar. 2. This is an appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 (hereinafter referred to as the “SC/ST Act”) against the refusal of prayer for anticipatory bail vide order dated 31.01.2024 in A.B.P. No. 3056 of 2024 passed by the learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge-cum-Special Judge S.C./S.T. (POA) Act, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 306 of 2023 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 324, Patna High Court CR. APP (SJ) No.1269 of 2024(3) dt.17-09-2025 2/2 325, 307, 327, 452, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code read with Section 27 of the Arms Act as well as Sections 3(1)(r)(s) and 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act. 3. In the nature of allegation as alleged in the FIR, the Court is not inclined to allow the appeal, as against the appellant, it is alleged that on account of dispute relating to land, he fired causing firearm injury to the informant. 4. Accordingly, the appeal stands rejected. Rishabh/- (Satyavrat Verma, J) U T