1 APHC010268522019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NOS: 12218 & 18940 OF 2019 WRIT PETITION NO: 12218 OF 2019 Between: 1.T SANGEETHA, W/O LATE MADAN MOHAM REDDY, D.NO. 20-3- 122/A3, SIVA JYOTHI NAGAR , 1-1 NEAR STATEBANK OF INDIA, AKKARAMPALLE ROAD, TIRUPATI. ...PETITIONER AND 1.TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAM, REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, TIRUMALA. 2.TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAM, REP BY ITS AEO (P AND R ), TIRUMALA. 3.TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAM, REP BY ITS VIGILENCE SECURITY OFFICER, AT TIRUMALA. 4.T MADHUSUDHAN REDDY S/O LATE T NAGI REDDY, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO.405, MIG, TUDA QUARTERS,MANGALAM, TIRUPATI URBAN MANDAL, CHITTOOR DISTRICT R4 IS IMPLEADED AS PER THE CO DT.21.10.2024 VIDE ORDERS PASSED IN IA NO.02 OF 2019. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.CH VENKAT RAMAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR TTD 2.MUNI REDDY PERURU 3.A SUMANTH ( SC FOR TTD) WRIT PETITION NO: 18940 OF 2019 Between: 1.T.MADHUSUDHAN REDDY, S/O LATE T.NAGI REDDY AGED ABOUT 49YRS, OCC- BUSINESS RIO FLAT NO.405, MIG, TUDA QUARTERS MANGALAM, TIRUPATI URBAN MANDAL CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAM TIRUMALA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER 2.THE ADDITIONAL EXECUTIVE OFFICER, THE TIRUMALA TIRUPATI DEVASTHANAM TIRUMALA, CHITTOOR DISTRICT 3.T SANGEETHA, W/O LATE MADAN MOHAN REDDY RIO D.NO.20-3- 1221A3, SIVA JYOTHI NAGAR NEAR STATE BANK OF INDIA, AKKARAMPALLE ROAD, TIRUPATI CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.S BALA MOHAN RANGA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI 2.CH VENKAT RAMAN 3 The Court made the following ORAL COMMON ORDER: Heard Sri C. Leela Srinivasa Varma, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner in W.P.No.12218 of 2019 and Sri Bala Mohan Ranga, Ld. Counsel for the Writ Petitioner in W.P.No.18940 of 2019 and Sri N.V.S. Prasad Varma, Ld. Standing Counsel for the T.T.D. 2. The facts in W.P.No.12218 of 2019 would indicate that one Sri T. Nagi Reddy was allotted a shop in the TTD Complex bearing shop No.349 near Mokalla Mitta (Near new Mandapam) on humanitarian grounds. Sri T. Nagi Reddy had four sons and one daughter. While the shop was being run by Sri T. Nagi Reddy, the first son by name Sri Madan Mohan Reddy had predeceased Sri T. Nagi Reddy (father) on 03.02.2016. On the date of his death, the deceased Sri Madan Mohan Reddy was survived by wife viz., Smt. T. Sangeeta and two minor children. The family was looked after by Sri T. Nagi Reddy. 3. Sri T. Nagi Reddy who is the original allottee had died on 28.04.2019. The widow of Sri Madan Mohan Reddy i.e., Smt. T. Sangeeta has filed O.S.No.573 of 2019 against the Tirumala Tirupati Devastanam (TTD) seeking to declare herself and their two minor sons as Legal Representatives of late Sri T. Madan Mohan Reddy, who is the son of Sri T. Nagi Reddy (original licensee). She has also made an Application before the Tirumala Tirupati Devastanam (TTD) for allotment of shop No.349 which was earlier allotted to her father-in-law. On 07.08.2019, the Tirumala Tirupati Devastanam (TTD) has rejected the request of Smt. T. Sangeeta (Ex.P.14), thereby, terminating the license granted in favour of Sri T. Nagi Reddy. Subsequently, the case of the Smt. T. Sangeeta was referred to the Estate Committee for fresh consideration. The Estate Committee, after having considered the case of Smt. T. Sangeeta, had allotted the said shop in her favour temporarily on humanitarian grounds till the outcome in W.P.No.12218 of 2019. This Writ Petition is also being now taken up. 4 4. The Writ Petitioner in W.P.no.18940 of 2019 is placing reliance on the alleged Registered Will dated 14.10.2010. It is also stated that the O.S.No.573 of 2019 is also pending on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tirupati for final adjudication. 5. Insofar as the impugned Proceeding of the Tirumala Tirupati Devastanam (TTD) dated 04.11.2019, by which the shop had been temporarily allotted to Smt. T. Sangeeta on humanitarian grounds is concerned, this Court is of the opinion that the humanitarian view taken by the Tirumala Tirupati Devastanam (TTD) cannot be faulted. 6. In this view of the matter, Smt. T. Sangeeta (Writ Petitioner in W.P.No.12218 of 2019) shall be allowed to continue to operate the shop on temporary basis till the conclusion of the O.S.No.573 of 2019, which is pending on the file of Principal Civil Judge (Junior Division), Tirupati. As indicated above, W.P.No.12218 of 2019 is disposed of. 7. Insofar as the W.P.No.18940 of 2014 is concerned, since this Court has already opined that the decision taken by the Tirumala Tirupati Devastanam (TTD) to temporarily allot the shop in favour of Smt. T. Sangeeta cannot be faulted, this Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed. No order as to costs. 8. Accordingly, W.P.No.12218 of 2019 is disposed of in terms of what is stated above and W.P.No.18940 of 2014 is dismissed. No order as to costs in both the Writ Petitions. 9. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this common order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 03.09.2025 Mnr 5 65 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NOS: 12218 & 18940 OF 2019 Dt: 03.09.2025 Mnr