1 2025:CGHC:41185 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 466 of 2021 1 - Smt. Parvati (Died Through Lrs) Nil (As Per Hon'ble Court Order Dated 04-03-2025) 1.1 - Tankeshwar S/o Late Pokhraj Patel Aged About 62 Years Occupation Agriculture R/o Village Jatri Post Jatri P.S. Pussour Tehsil Pussourt District Raigharh Chhattisgarh 1.2 - Smt. Janki Patel W/o Heeralal Patel Aged About 66 Years Occupation Housewife R/o Village Kandola Post Bonda P.S. Tehsil Sariya District Sarangarh Bilaigarh 1.3 - Smt Haripriysa Verma Wd/o Late Top Lal Verma Aged About 64 Years Occupation House Wife R/o Village Kapisda P.S. Sarangarh Tehsil Sarangarh District Sarangarh Bilaigarh 1.4 - Smt. Tara Bai Choudhary W/o Nilambar Choudhary Aged About 60 Years Occupation Housewife R/o Village Kotba P.S. Kotba Tehsil Bagbahar District Jashpur Chhattisgarh 1.5 - Tikam Singh Patel S/o Late Pokhraj Patel Aged About 58 Years Occupation Service R/o Village Jatri Post Jatri P.S. And Tehsil Pussour District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ... Petitioners versus 1 - Sukdev Chaudhary S/o Bansidhar Choudhary Aged About 41 Years R/o Village Ameri, P.O. Deogaon, Tehsil Baramkela, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 2 - Ramlal S/o Krishnachand Aged About 77 Years Caste Aghariya, R/o Village Ameri, Tehsil Baramkela, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 3 - Basudev S/o Ramlal Aged About 56 Years Caste Aghariya, Occupation Agriculturist, R/o Village Ameri, Tehsil Baramkela, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 4 - Nand Dev S/o Ramlal Aged About 48 Years Caste Aghariya, Occupation Agriculturist, Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.08.18 14:12:44 +0530 2 R/o Village Ameri, Tehsil Baramkela, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. 5 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Collector Raigarh District Raigarh Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioners : Shri Priyanshu Gupta, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Shri Pallav Mishra, Advocate For Respondent No.5 : Shri Pramod Shrivastava, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 14/08/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that this petition has been filed against the interlocutory orders dated 19.7.2021 and 5.8.2021 passed by the Executing Court, whereby the objection raised by the petitioner was rejected. He would contend that the execution proceedings have already been concluded and further possession has been handed over to the decree holder. 2. At this stage, learned counsel for the petitioners would seek permission of this Court to withdraw this petition with liberty to avail remedy available under the law against the final order passed in the execution case. 3. Permission granted. 4. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) JUDGE Gopal