[2025:RJ-JP:40073] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 198/2023 Jagdish S/o Shri Ghasi, Aged About 73 Years, R/o Village Shrikishanpura, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur ----Petitioner Versus 1. M/s V.n. Buildtech Private Limited, Registered Office Exclusive-444, Khasra No. 705/1, 705/2, 703, 706 Village Shrikishanpura, Jagatpura Jaipur 303905 Through Authorized Director Shri Naveen Kumar Heeranandani 2. Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur, Jln Road, Jaipur, Zone-Nine (090), Through Deputy Commissioner ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Singh Shekhawat, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vikas Jain, Adv. Mr. Yuvraj Samant, Adv. HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE UMA SHANKER VYAS Judgment / Order REPORTABLE RESERVED ON : 24/09/2025 PRONOUNCED ON : 06/10/2025 ;kph&izfroknh Øe&1 ¼ftls vkxs ^^izfroknh Øe&1** dgk tk;sxk½ }kjk ;g nhokuh fuxjkuh ;kfpdk varxZr /kkjk 115 lh-ih-lh- oknh&izR;FkhZ Øe&1 ¼vkxs ^^oknh** dgk tk;sxk½ rFkk izR;FkhZ Øe&2&izfroknh Øe&2 ¼vkxs ^^izfroknh Øe&2** dgk tk;sxk½ ds fo:) fo}ku vij ftyk U;k;k/kh'k Øe&10] t;iqj [2025:RJ-JP:40073] (2 of 15) [CR-198/2023] egkuxj izFke ¼eq[;ky; lkaxkusj½ }kjk nhokuh okn la[;k&77@2023 esa ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 09-06-2023 ls O;fFkr gksdj izLrqr dh] ftlds ek/;e ls izfroknh Øe&1 dk vkosnu varxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- [kkfjt fd;k x;kA fo}ku vf/koDrk izfroknh Øe&1 rFkk oknh dh cgl lquh xbZ] vfHkys[k dk voyksdu fd;k x;kA lqlaxr rF; ;g gS fd oknh }kjk foØ; vuqca/k dh fofufnZ"V vuqikyuk dk okn izfroknh Øe&1 txnh'k rFkk izfroknh Øe&2 t;iqj fodkl izkf/kdj.k ds fo:) izLrqr dj vfHkdfFkr fd;k fd izfroknh Øe&1 txnh'k /kk.kdk tks fd vuqlwfpr tutkr lnL; dk gS] ds }kjk oknh ds i{k esa fnukad 13-04-2015 dks foØ; vuqca/k esa mYysf[kr d`f"k Hkwfe 0-53 gSDVs;j ds ckcr~ ,d foØ; vuqca/k fu"ikfnr dj ;g r; fd;k fd izfroknh Øe&1 viuh d`f"k Hkwfe dk vkoklh; iz;kstukFkZ :ikarj.k djokdj r; izfrQy ds cnys oknxzLr Hkwfe dk foØ; i= oknh ds i{k esa fu"ikfnr djok nsxk] vkaf'kd Hkqxrku ds ckn 'ks"k jkf'k dk Hkqxrku Hkwfe dk :ikarj.k o foØ; i= fu"ikfnr gksus ds lkFk vnk fd;k tkuk r; gqvk rFkk d`f"k Hkwfe ds :ikarj.k dk laiw.kZ [kpZ 'krZ la[;k&8 ds vuqlkj oknh }kjk ogu djuk rFkk bl gsrq lkjh dk;Zokgh izfroknh Øe&1 }kjk fd;k tku r; gqvkA oknh dk ;g Hkh vfHkdFku jgk gS fd bl Hkwfe ds laca/k esa jktLFkku Hkw&jktLo vf/kfu;e] 1956 dh /kkjk 90, ds rgr d`f"k Hkwfe dk :ikarj.k vkoklh; iz;kstukFkZ gks pqdk gS] ijarq izfroknh Øe&1 foØ; i= fu"ikfnr djokus gsrq rRij ugha gS [2025:RJ-JP:40073] (3 of 15) [CR-198/2023] vkSj bl vk/kkj ij lafonk dh fofufnZ"V vuqikyuk o LFkk;h fu"ks/kkKk dk vuqrks"k iznRr fd;s tkus ds ckcr~ okn e; [kpkZ fMØh fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA izfroknh Øe&1 }kjk vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr fopkj.k U;k;ky; esa vkosnu izLrqr dj izFke vkifRr ;g yh dh /kkjk 99 t;iqj fodkl izkf/kdj.k vf/kfu;e] 1982 ds rgr izdj.k dh lquokbZ dk {ks=kf/kdkj flfoy U;k;ky; dks ugha gS rFkk ;g vkifRr vk{ksfir vkns'k ds ek/;e ls vLohdkj dh xbZ ysfdu bl vkifRr dks bl U;k;ky; esa nkSjkus cgl izsl ugha fd;k gS] vr% bl ij vkxs fopkj fd;s tkus dh vko';drk ugha gSA vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds vkosnu ds ek/;e ls izfroknh Øe&1 }kjk f}rh; vkifRr ;g yh xbZ fd dfFkr foØ; vuqca/k ds le; oknxzLr Hkwfe d`f"k Hkwfe Fkh rFkk jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ¼vkxs ^^vf/kfu;e&1955** dgk tk;sxk½ dh /kkjk 42ch ds rgr dfFkr foØ; vuqca/k izkjaHk ls gh 'kwU; gS vkSj mlds vk/kkj ij okn iks"k.kh; ugha gksdj ukeatwj gksus ;ksX; gSA ;g vkifRr Hkh fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk vLohdkj dh xbZ vkSj izfroknh Øe&1 dk vkosnu varxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- [kkfjt fd;k x;k] ftlls O;fFkr gksdj ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk izLrqr dh xbZ gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk izfroknh Øe&1 dk ;g rdZ gS fd vf/kfu;e&1955 dh /kkjk 42ch ds izko/kkuksa dks ns[krs gq, ;g foØ; vuqca/k 'kq: ls gh 'kwU; gS] blds vk/kkj ij oknh dks dksbZ [2025:RJ-JP:40073] (4 of 15) [CR-198/2023] Hkh fof/kd vf/kdkj izkIr ugha gksrs gSa] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa lafonk dh fofufnZ"V vuqikyuk dk fof/kd vf/kdkj Hkh mRiUu ugha gksus ls oknh dks dksbZ okn dkj.k mRiUu ugha gqvk gS vkSj vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj ;g okn fof/k }kjk oftZr gSA ;g Hkh fuosnu fd;k fd fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk rF;ksa o fof/kd izko/kkuksa ds foijhr tkdj vk{ksfir vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS] tks fujLr gksus rFkk izfroknh Øe&1 dk vkosnu varxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- Lohdkj gksdj okn ukeatwj gksus ;ksX; gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk ;kph&izfroknh Øe&1 dh vksj ls izLrqr U;kf;d fu.kZ; Rajasthan Housing Board Vs. New Pink City Nirman Sahkari Samiti Limited and Anr. (2015) 7 SCC 601 esa lgdkjh lfefr ds i{k esa vuqlwfpr tkfr ds lnL; }kjk viuh d`f"k Hkwfe ds ckcr~ foØ; vuqca/k fu"ikfnr fd;k x;k Fkk] dkykarj esa ;g Hkwfe jktLFkku vkoklu e.My }kjk vokIr dj yh xbZ Fkh] blds eqvkots ds laca/k esa mijksDr foØ; vuqca/k ds vk/kkj ij lgdkjh lfefr }kjk Dyse izLrqr fd;k x;k ysfdu ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk varr% ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k fd jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e dh /kkjk 42ch ds izko/kkuksa dks ns[krs gq, xSj vuqlwfpr tkfr ds fof/kd O;fDr ds i{k esa fu"ikfnr foØ; vuqca/k 'kwU;dj.kh; ugha gksdj izkjaHk ls gh 'kwU; gS vkSj blds vk/kkj ij fdlh Hkh Lrj ij Øsrk lgdkjh lfefr dks dksbZ o fdlh izdkj ds fof/kd vf/kdkj izkIr ugha gksrs gSa] ,sls vuqca/k dkuwuh izko/kkuksa o yksd uhfr ds foijhr gksus ls 'kq: ls [2025:RJ-JP:40073] (5 of 15) [CR-198/2023] 'kwU; gS rFkk i`Fkd ls 'kwU; ?kksf"kr gksus dh dksbZ vko';drk ugha gS] mijksDr fu.kZ; dk iSjk la[;k&26 lqlaxr gS] tks fuEukuqlkj gS%& "26. In the instant case, the transaction is ab initio void, that is, right from its inception and is not voidable at the volition by virtue of the specific language used in Section 42 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act. There is declaration that such transaction of sale of holding "shall be void". As the provision is declaratory, no further declaration is required to declare prohibited transaction a nullity. No right accrues to a person on the basis of such a transaction. The person who enters into an agreement to purchase the same, is aware of the consequences of the provision carved out in order to protect weaker sections of Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes. The right to claim compensation accrues from right, title or interest in the land. When such right, title or interest in land is inalienable to non-SC/ST, obviously the agreements entered into by the Society with the Khatedars are clearly void and decrees obtained on the basis of the agreement are violative of the mandate of Section 42 of the Rajasthan Tenancy Act and are a nullity. Such a prohibited transaction opposed to public policy, cannot be enforced. Any other interpretation would be defeasive of the very intent and protection carved out Under Section 42 as per the mandate of Article 46 of the Constitution, in favour of the poor castes and downtrodden persons, included in the Schedules to Articles 341 and 342 of the Constitution of India." blh izdkj fo}ku vf/koDrk izfroknh Øe&1 dh vksj ls izLrqr vU; fu.kZ; Banwari Lal Vs. Anand and Ors. 2012 (2) WLC (Raj.) 87 esa Hkh vuqlwfpr tkfr ds O;fDr ds }kjk xSj [2025:RJ-JP:40073] (6 of 15) [CR-198/2023] vuqlwfpr tkfr ds O;fDr ds i{k ds esa d`f"k Hkwfe ds laca/k esa foØ; vuqca/k fu"ikfnr fd;k x;k Fkk rFkk ;g 'krZ r; dh xbZ Fkh fd vkoklh; iV~Vk izkIr djus ds ckn foØ; i= fu"ikfnr o iathd`r djok fn;k tk;sxk ijarq blds ckotwn Hkh mijksDr fu.kZ; esa ,sls foØ; vuqca/k dks 'kq: ls 'kwU; gksuk ekurs gq, fofufnZ"V vuqikyuk dk okn vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds izko/kkuksa ds rgr ukeatwj fd;k x;k] mijksDr fu.kZ; ds iSjk la[;k&9] 18 o 19 lqlaxr gSa] tks fuEukuqlkj gSa%& "9. Section 42 (b) of the Act provides that the sale, gift or bequest by a khatedar tenant shall be void, if such sale, gift or bequest is by a member of scheduled caste in favour of a person who is not a member of scheduled caste, or by a member of scheduled tribe in favour of a person who is not a member of scheduled tribe. Meaning thereby, a member of scheduled caste may transfer his interest in whole or a part of his holding only to the member of the scheduled caste and a member of scheduled tribe may to a member of the scheduled tribe only. The emphasis of Section 42 is to maintain rights of a member of scheduled caste/scheduled tribe in their own category. The transferee should be a member of scheduled caste, if the transferor is from scheduled caste, and same will be the position in the caste of scheduled tribe also. As a matter of fact Section 42 does not permit transfer of interest in a land holding by a member of scheduled caste/scheduled tribe even to a person who is not having any caste. The sole emphasis of the provisions of Section 42 is to protect scheduled castes and scheduled tribes from social injustice and to ensure their economic rights. For this purpose land holding rights of these sections are kept intact in their own category. [2025:RJ-JP:40073] (7 of 15) [CR-198/2023] 18. Thus, it is clear that even for a suit for specific performance to be maintained it is essential that the contract or agreement, upon which the suit is based, should be valid and enforceable in law and if it suffers from some defect which makes it invalid or enforceable, the suit cannot be maintained. 19. In the present case, the agreement to sell dated 10.5.2002 said to be executed by the petitioner a member of scheduled caste, in favour of the non-petitioners members of general class, is void and forbidden by law being made in contravention of Section 42 (b) of the Act and provisions of Section 23 of the Indian Contract Act, even a suit for specific performance cannot be maintained upon it. The learned Court below without considering the matter in a right perspective has dismissed the application filed by the petitioner under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC only by finding that the question raised is a mixed question of fact and law which can be decided only after recording the evidence of the parties. Order 7 Rule 11 CPC provides that if from the averments made in the plaint the suit appears to be barred by law, the plaint would be liable to be rejected. The net result of the above discussion is that the revision petition is liable to be allowed and as a consequence of that the application filed under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC is also liable to be allowed and the plaint filed by the non- petitioners is required to be rejected." blds foijhr fo}ku vf/koDrk oknh dk rdZ gS fd vf/kfu;e&1955 dh /kkjk 42ch ds izko/kku foØ;] migkj o olh;r ds ekeys esa ykxw gksrs gSa] tcfd orZeku ekeys esa ek= foØ; vuqca/k gh fu"ikfnr gqvk gS rFkk okn izLrqfr ds le; ;g Hkwfe vkoklh; iz;kstukFkZ :ikarfjr gks pqdh gS] vr% ,slh fLFkfr esa [2025:RJ-JP:40073] (8 of 15) [CR-198/2023] ;g okn iks"k.kh; gS rFkk fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk ikfjr vk{ksfir vkns'k dks rF;ksa o fof/k ds vuq:i gksuk crkrs gq, ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk [kkfjt fd;s tkus dk fuosnu fd;kA /kkjk 42ch jktLFkku dk'rdkjh vf/kfu;e] 1955 ds lqlaxr izko/kku fuEukuqlkj gSa%& "42. General restriction on sale, gift and bequest:-The sale, gift or bequest by the khatedar tenants of his interest in the whole or part of his holding shall be void, if- (a) Omitted (b) Such sale, gift or bequest is by a member of scheduled caste in favour of a person who is not a member of the Scheduled Caste, or by a member of a Scheduled Tribe in favour of a person who is not member of scheduled tribe." fo}ku vf/koDrk oknh }kjk izLrqr fu.kZ; esa Ramesh Chand (D) Thr. LRS. Vs. Suresh Chand and Anr. 2025 SCC Online 1879 ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk foØ; o foØ; vuqca/k dk Hksn of.kZr djrs gq, ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd foØ; ds ekeys esa laifRr ds vf/kdkj varfjr gksrs gSa] tcfd foØ; vuqca/k ds ekeys esa vuqca/k dh fofufnZ"V ikyuk dk fof/kd vf/kdkj mRiUu gksrk gSA bl ekeys esa vuqlwfpr tutkfr ds lnL; dh laifRr ds varj.k vkfn ds laca/k esa dksbZ fookn ugha FkkA blds foijhr ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; }kjk Rajasthan Housing Board Vs. New Pink City Nirman Sahkari Samiti Limited and Anr. ¼iwoksZDr½ ds ekeys esa vf/kfu;e&1955 dh /kkjk 42ch ds izko/kkuksa ij fopkj djus ds mijkar ;g Li"V :i ls vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd bl izko/kku ds mYya?ku esa ;fn dksbZ foØ; vuqca/k fu"ikfnr gqvk gS] rks og 'kwU;dj.kh; ugha [2025:RJ-JP:40073] (9 of 15) [CR-198/2023] gksdj izkjaHk ls gh 'kwU; gS vkSj blds vk/kkj ij dksbZ fof/kd vf/kdkj Øsrk dks izkIr ugha gksrs gSa rFkk ,slk vuqca/k tks fd fof/kd izko/kku ds vuqlkj gh 'kwU; gS] rks vyx ls 'kwU; o vekU; ?kksf"kr fd;s tkus dh dksbZ vko';drk ugha gSA mijksDr fu.kZ; esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj tc vuqca/k ds vk/kkj ij Øsrk dks dksbZ fof/kd vf/kdkj mRiUu gh ugha gksrs gSa rks ,slh fLFkfr esa foØ; vuqca/k dh fofufnZ"V vuqikyuk dk vf/kdkj Hkh mlds i{k esa l`ftr ugha gksrk gS vkSj tc mlds i{k esa dksbZ fof/kd vf/kdkj gh ugha gS rks mlds mYya?ku dk vFkok okn dkj.k mRiUu gksus dk dksbZ iz'u gh mRiUu ugha gksrk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds mijksDr fu.kZ; rFkk bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ihB }kjk Banwari Lal Vs. Anand and Ors. ¼iwoksZDr½ esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj oknh dks dksbZ okn dkj.k mRiUu ugha gqvk gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk oknh dh vksj ls izLrqr fu.kZ; S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 182/2023 Pappulal Vs. M/S S.N. Realmart esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 11-07-2025 ds ekeys esa vfHkdFkuksa ds vuqlkj oknxzLr Hkwfe vkoklh; iz;kstukFkZ :ikarfjr FkhA mijksDr ekeys esa foØ; vuqca/k ds le; ;g Hkwfe d`f"k Hkwfe Fkh] ,slk dksbZ rF; mijksDr fu.kZ; ls Li"V ugha gksrk gSA blds vykok bl ekeys esa vuqca/k dh fofufnZ"V vuqikyuk ds fodYi esa jde olwyh dk Hkh vuqrks"k pkgk x;k FkkA oknh dh vksj ls bl U;k;ky; dh led{k ih+B }kjk S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 150/2016 Ramniwas Vs. Bhairav Grah Nirman Sahkari Samiti Ltd. esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 03-02-2017 esa ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd ;|fi vuqlwfpr [2025:RJ-JP:40073] (10 of 15) [CR-198/2023] tutkfr ds lnL; ds }kjk xSj&vuqlwfpr tutkfr ds lnL; ds i{k esa fd;k x;k foØ; vuqca/k 'kwU; gS] ijarq vf/kfu;e&1955 dh /kkjk 42ch esa okn izLrqr djus ij dksbZ izfrca/k ugha gS vkSj ;g okn fof/k }kjk oftZr ugha ekuk tk ldrk ysfdu ;g fu.kZ; ikfjr djrs le; iwoZorhZ ,dyihB ds fu.kZ; Banwari Lal Vs. Anand and Ors. Anand and Ors. ¼iwoksZDr½ ij dksbZ fopkj ugha fd;k x;k gS] tcfd iwoZorhZ fu.kZ; esa led{k ihB dk foijhr er jgk gSA oknh dh vksj ls bl U;k;ky; dh ,dyihB }kjk S.B. Civil Revision Petition No. 5/2023 Premlata Vs. Devendra Daga and Anr. esa ikfjr fu.kZ; fnukad 04-08-2023 Hkh izLrqr fd;k x;k] bl ekeys esa oknxzLr Hkwfe ds laca/k esa uxj ifj"kn }kjk vkoklh; Hkwfe dk iV~Vk tkjh fd;k tk pqdk Fkk rFkk foØ; vuqca/k d`f"k Hkwfe ds laca/k esa Fkk] ;g rF; Li"V ugha gqvk gSA tgka rd iwoZ fu.kZ; ds ca/kudkjh izHkko (Law of Precedent) dk iz'u gS] bl laca/k esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; dk fu.kZ; Central Board Of Dawoodi Bohra Vs. State Of Maharashtra & Anr. (2005) 2 SCC 673 egRoiw.kZ o ekxZn'kZd fu.kZ; gS] ftldk lqlaxr iSjk la[;k&12 fuEukuqlkj gS%& "12. Having carefully considered the submissions made by the learned Senior Counsel for the parties and having examined the law laid down by the Constitution Benches in the abovesaid decisions, we would like to sum up the legal position in the following terms: (1) The law laid down by this Court in a decision delivered by a Bench of larger strength is binding on any subsequent Bench of lesser or coequal strength. [2025:RJ-JP:40073] (11 of 15) [CR-198/2023] (2) A Bench of lesser quorum cannot disagree or dissent from the view of the law taken by a Bench of larger quorum. In case of doubt all that the Bench of lesser quorum can do is to invite the attention of the Chief Justice and request for the matter being placed for hearing before a Bench of larger quorum than the Bench whose decision has come up for consideration. It will be open only for a Bench of coequal strength to express an opinion doubting the correctness of the view taken by the earlier Bench of coequal strength, whereupon the matter may be placed for hearing before a Bench consisting of a quorum larger than the one which pronounced the decision laying down the law the correctness of which is doubted. (3) The above rules are subject to two exceptions: (i) the abovesaid rules do not bind the discretion of the Chief Justice in whom vests the power of framing the roster and who can direct any particular matter to be placed for hearing before any particular Bench of any strength; and (ii) in spite of the rules laid down hereinabove, if the matter has already come up for hearing before a Bench of larger quorum and that Bench itself feels that the view of the law taken by a Bench of lesser quorum, which view is in doubt, needs correction or reconsideration then by way of exception (and not as a rule) and for reasons given by it, it may proceed to hear the case and examine the correctness of the previous decision in question dispensing with the need of a specific reference or the order of the Chief Justice constituting the Bench and such listing. Such was the situation in Raghubir Singh and Hansoli Devi." [2025:RJ-JP:40073] (12 of 15) [CR-198/2023] mijksDr fu.kZ; esa izfrikfnr O;oLFkk ds vuqlkj ;g Li"V gS fd ;fn fdlh fcanq ij mlh mPp U;k;ky; dh dks&bDoy cSap dk iwoZorhZ fu.kZ; gS] rks i'pkr~orhZ led{k ihB mlls vlger gksdj vu&lSVy ugha dj ldrh gS] vlgefr gksus ij cM+h cSap dks ekeyk lanfHkZr fd;k tk ldrk gS vU;Fkk dks&bDoy cSap dk iwoZorhZ fu.kZ; gh leku ihB ij vkc)dj gksxkA tSlk fd Åij foospu fd;k x;k gS] oknh i{k dh vksj ls izLrqr fu.kZ; Premlata Vs. Devendra Daga and Anr. ¼iwoksZDr½ rFkk Pappulal Vs. M/S S.N. Realmart ¼iwoksZDr½ ds ekeys esa loZizFke rks vuqca/k d`f"k Hkwfe dk Fkk] ;g Li"V ugha gks jgk gS] fodYi esa ;g eku Hkh fy;k tkos fd ewy foØ; vuqca/k d`f"k Hkwfe ds laca/k esa Fkk rc Hkh oknh i{k dh vksj ls izLrqr rhukas gh U;kf;d fu.kZ; tks ,dyihB ds gSa] mlls iwoZ bl U;k;ky; dh ,dyihB }kjk bl fcanq ij Banwari Lal Vs. Anand and Ors. ¼iwoksZDr½ dk fu.kZ; fnukad 03-05-2012 ds ek/;e ls ;g O;oLFkk izfrikfnr gks pqdh Fkh fd d`f"k Hkwfe ds laca/k esa fd;k x;k foØ; vuqca/k izkjaHk ls gh 'kwU; gS vkSj mldh fofufnZ"V vuqikyuk dk okn iks"k.kh; ugha gS vkSj ,slk okn vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds rgr ukeatwj gksus ;ksX; gSA laiw.kZ ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa Banwari Lal Vs. Anand and Ors. ¼iwoksZDr½ dk gh fu.kZ; bl fcanq ij vkc)dkjh izHkko j[krs gq, v[kf.Mr jgk gS] ,slh fLFkfr esa oknh dh vksj ls izLrqr mijksDr rhuksa gh fu.kZ; oknh dks ykHk igqapkus dh fLFkfr esa ugha gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk oknh dh vksj ls ekuuh; dukZVd mPp U;k;ky; }kjk W.P. No. 60483/2016 Sri. Munnaiah and Ors. Vs. [2025:RJ-JP:40073] (13 of 15) [CR-198/2023] The Deputy Commissioner and Ors. esa ikfjr vkns'k fnukad 05-07-2021 izLrqr fd;k x;k] ftldk llEeku voyksdu fd;k x;kA mijksDr ekeys esa vuqlwfpr tutkfr dh d`f"k Hkwfe dks foØ; djus gsrq iw.kZ izfrca/k ugha Fkk] vfirq vuqefr ds lkFk foØ; laHko Fkk] ,slh vuqefr Øsrk dks izkIr djuh FkhA ;g vfHkfu/kkZfjr fd;k x;k gS fd ;fn foØsrk foØ; vuqca/k dh ikyuk gsrq lger ugha gksrk gS rks U;k;ky; ls lafonk dh fofufnZ"V vuqikyuk dh fMØh izkIr djus ds ckn Øsrk }kjk vuqefr izkIr dj foØ; i= fu"ikfnr o iathd`r djok;k tk ldrk gS vkSj mijksDr ifjfLFkfr;ksa esa okn fof/k }kjk oftZr ugha ekuk x;k] tcfd orZeku ekeys esa vf/kfu;e&1955 dh /kkjk 42ch ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj vuqlwfpr tutkfr dh d`f"k Hkwfe dk foØ; xSj vuqlwfpr tutkfr ds lnL; dks iw.kZ :i ls oftZr gS] vr% rF;ksa esa fHkUurk ds dkj.k ls mijksDr fu.kZ; orZeku ekeys esa ykxw ugha gksrk gSA fo}ku vf/koDrk oknh dk ,d rdZ ;g Hkh jgk gS fd orZeku okn izLrqr djus ds le; fookfnr d`f"k Hkwfe dk vkoklh; iz;kstukFkZ :ikarj.k gks pqdk Fkk] ,slh fLFkfr esa okn fof/k }kjk oftZr gksuk ugha ekuk tk ldrk] vr% Banwari Lal Vs. Anand and Ors. Anand and Ors. ¼iwoksZDr½ dk fu.kZ; ykxw ugha gksrk gSA bl laca/k esa vfHkys[k ds voyksdu ls Li"V gS fd orZeku ekeys esa fookfnr foØ; vuqca/k fnukad 13-04-2015 dks fu"ikfnr gqvk gS rFkk mlesa mYysf[kr 'krksZa ds vuqlkj oknh }kjk vuqlwfpr tutkfr ds izfroknh Øe&1 ls d`f"k Hkwfe gh foØ; djus dk vuqca/k fd;k x;k gS rFkk r; 'krksZa ds eqrkfcd bl Hkwfe dks [2025:RJ-JP:40073] (14 of 15) [CR-198/2023] :ikarfjr djus dk laiw.kZ 'kqYd dk nkf;Ro oknh ds ftEes j[kk x;k gS] vr% Li"V gS fd xSj&vuqlwfpr tutkfr ds izfroknh dh d`f"k Hkwfe [kjhnus dk vuqca/k iw.kZ gks pqdk Fkk rFkk pwafd foØ; i= fof/kr% fu"iknu o iathd`r gksuk laHko ugha Fkk] vr% oknh }kjk viuh vksj ls Hkwfe :ikarj.k ds laca/k esa laiw.kZ jkf'k tek djkuk r; djrs gq, ;g Hkwfe izkIr djus dk vuqca/k fd;k x;kA fof/k dk ;g lqLFkkfir fl)kar gS fd tks dk;Z fof/k }kjk izR;{k :i ls oftZr gS] og vizR;{k :i ls Hkh laHko ugha gSA Rajasthan Housing Board Vs. New Pink City Nirman Sahkari Samiti Limited and Anr. ¼iwoksZDr½ esa ekuuh; loksZPp U;k;ky; ds }kjk ;g O;oLFkk izfrikfnr dh gS fd vf/kfu;e&1955 dh /kkjk 42ch ds izko/kku vuqlwfpr tkfr o tutkfr ds lkekftd :i ls detksj rFkk fiNM+s ukxfjdksa ds vf/kdkjksa ds laj{k.k gsrq gSa rFkk os lafo/kku ds vuq:i gSa vkSj ,slh fLFkfr esa bu izko/kkuksa dh Hkkouk ds vuq:i gh ldkjkRed O;k[;k djrs gq, gh foospuk fd;k tkuk vko';d gSA mijksDr fo/kk;h ea'kk rFkk orZeku ekeys esa foØ; vuqca/k dh tks 'krsZa gSa] mls ns[krs gq, orZeku foØ; vuqca/k izkjaHk ls gh 'kwU; gS vkSj i'pkr~orhZ fdlh Hkh ?kVuk ds vk/kkj ij og 'kwU;dj.kh; vFkok izorZuh; ugha gks ldrk gSA orZeku foØ; vuqca/k ds vk/kkj ij oknh dks fofufnZ"V vuqikyuk ds fof/kd vf/kdkj lfgr dksbZ vf/kdkj mRiUu ugha gqvk gS] vr% mlds dfFkr mYya?ku dk iz'u gh mRiUu ugha gksrk gS vkSj ifj.kker% oknh dks dksbZ okn dkj.k mRiUu ugha gksus ls okn vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- ds izko/kkuksa ds vuqlkj Li"Vr% fof/k }kjk oftZr gS] ysfdu blds ckotwn fo}ku fopkj.k U;k;ky; }kjk rF;ksa ds [2025:RJ-JP:40073] (15 of 15) [CR-198/2023] foijhr tkdj vk{ksfir vkns'k ikfjr fd;k gS] tks vikLr gksus rFkk ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk Lohdkj gksus ;ksX; gSA ifj.kker% ;kph&izfroknh Øe&1 dh vksj ls izLrqr ;g fuxjkuh ;kfpdk Lohdkj djrs gq, vk{ksfir vkns'k fnukad 09-06-2023 vikLr fd;k tkrk gS vkSj ifj.kkeLo:i izfroknh Øe&1 dk vkosnu varxZr vkns'k 7 fu;e 11 lh-ih-lh- Lohdkj fd;k tkdj oknh dk okn ukeatwj fd;k tkrk gSA (UMA SHANKER VYAS),J DINESH KUMAWAT / reserve (71)