Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27785 (GAU)

FARIDUL ISLAM v. THE STATE OF ASSAM

Bail Appln./3540/2025 · 2025-11-11

Sanjeev Kumar Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010241932025 2025:GAU-AS:15301 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : Bail Appln./3540/2025 FARIDUL ISLAM S/O- ABDUL KALAM, R/O- VILL- KUKUWARI, PO- KURANIBORI, PS MAYONG, DIST. MORIGAON, ASSAM, PIN-782411 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REP BY THE PP, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. SK S N MOHAMMAD, MR ARJU IKBAL Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, B E F O R E HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER 12.11.2025 Heard Mr. S K N Mohammad, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D P Goswami, learned Addl. Public Prosecutor. 2. This is an application under Section 483 of the BNSS, 2023 paying for releasing on bail of the petitioner, namely; Faridul Islam, who was arrested on Page No.# 2/3 23.10.2025 and produced before the CJM, Kamrup, Amingaon on 23.10.2025 in connection with Palashbari PS Case No. 261/2025, under Section 61(2)/308(4) BNS. 3. That the prosecution case is that one Mandira Das lodged an ejahar on 22.10.2025 with Palashbari Police Station, Kamrup, alleging that on 31.10.2025, in the evening at about 08:19 p.m., her husband, Sekher Jyoti Kalita, had got a call from an unknown number (7086339507) and that after receiving the phone, from the other side a male person had said that he had been hired to kill and do black magic on her, her husband, her son and her mother. When her husband had questioned who had hired him, he had said that Geetanjali Kalita (Pn. No. 600188442) had asked him to kill them. It was further stated that after that, through WhatsApp, he had sent all their photos mentioning their names. In order not to be killed, he had called them to Narengi to meet him. They had got scared, so in the afternoon they had gone to Narengi to meet Akram Ali. After that, he had demanded four thousand rupees from them, and they had paid the four thousand rupees through Google Pay. It was also stated that last night he had again called them and had demanded money from them, and that on the next day, the accused along with his mate had come to their shop “Flowrina,” which is situated in Mirza. Having no other way, they had started shouting and had informed the police. 4. On the basis of the ejahar, the police of Palashbari Police Station had registered a case being Palashbari P.S. Case No. 261/2025, U/s. 61(2)/308(4) BNS. 5. It appears from the Case Diary that there is some material against the petitioner as he allegedly accompanied the main accused Akram Ali to collect Page No.# 3/3 the money but beyond that there is no other material against him and in the meantime, the petitioner has spent 21 days in custody. 6. In view of above, the prayer for bail is allowed. He shall be released on bail of Rs. 20,000/- only with one surety of the like amount, subject to the satisfaction of CJM, Kamrup Amingaon. 7. It is further provided that the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation and shall not try to influence or intimidate the witnesses in the case. 8. The bail application stands allowed and disposed of. JUDGE Comparing Assistant