1 2025:CGHC:26564-DB NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1923 of 2025 Mohit Lal Yadav S/o Balsai Ram Yadav Aged About 32 Years R/o Jumaikela,kansabel, Distt.- Jashpur, (C.G.), At Present Resided R/o. Awadh Vihar Colony, Dumar Talab, Thana - Amaanaka, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - The State of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station - Mujhgahan, District- Raipur (C.G.) 2 - Pooja Khandelwal D/o Manish Khandelwal Aged About 25 Years Occupation - Business, R/o. Near Mahamaya Temple, Purani Basti, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Neeraj Mehta, Advocate For Respondent No.1 : Mr. Soumya Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Bibhu Datta Guru , Judge Order on Board Per Ramesh Sinha , Chief Justice 23.06.2025 1. Heard Mr. Neeraj Mehta learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Mr. Soumya Rai, learned Panel Lawyer, appearing for the State/respondent No.1. ANURADHA TIWARI Digitally signed by ANURADHA TIWARI Date: 2025.06.24 10:29:00 +0530 2 2. The present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “1. allow this petition. 2. Quash the FIR No.47/2025 dated 23.02.2025 registered at Police Station Mujhgahan, District Raipur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 75 of B.N.S. 2023 and petitioner be discharged, in the interest of justice.” 3. On perusal of the prayers in the present petition, it transpires that the present petition is drafted with the prayers which are defective as though the charge-sheet has been filed, but in the prayer, the same has not been challenged, therefore, we are not inclined to entertain the present petition with such a vague and sketchy prayers without quashing of the charge-sheet, to which learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present petition with a liberty to file afresh petition with proper prayers. 4. Learned State counsel has no objection. 5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty, as prayed for subject to depositing a sum of Rs.2,000/- as cost by the petitioner in the Registry of this Court and the said amount shall be transmitted to the Government Disabled College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 6. Certified copy of the impugned FIR as well as charge-sheet as also the other documents may be returned back to the petitioner after retaining photocopy of the same. Sd/- Sd/- (Bibhu Datta Guru) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice Anu