Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27776 (HP)

OM PRAKASH v. STATE OF HP AND OTHERS

CWP/4296/2025 · 2025-05-13

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No.4296 of 2025 Date of decision: 13.05.2025 Om Prakash. ...Petitioner. Versus State of H.P. & Ors. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioner : Mr. Munish Datwalia, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Notice. Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed for the grant of following substantive relief(s):- “A. That the Hon'ble Court may kindly direct the respondents to extended the benefit of Judgment dated 07.07.2023 passed in CWP No. 2500/2021 in favour of petitioners. B. That your lordship may further graciously be pleased to issue the writ in nature of mandamus directing the respondents to fix the pay of the petitioners in pay band of 10300-34800+4400 grade pay with additional promotional increment on account of promotion to HT w.e.f. 01.10.2012 -2- with all consequential benefits as has done with the incumbents promoted to the post of head teachers after 01.10.2012 with all consequential benefits @ 9%.” 3. Admittedly, the petitioner has invoked extra ordinary jurisdiction of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India without even preferring any representation to the competent authority for the redresssal of his grievances raised in the writ petition. 4. Confronted with above, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner would be preferring representation within two weeks from today. In case, such representation is so preferred, the competent authority shall consider and decide the same, in accordance with law, within further period of six weeks. The order so passed shall also be communicated to the petitioner. The writ petition stands disposed of in the above terms, so also the pending miscellaneous application(s), if any. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 13th May, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)