Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27776 (AP)

SKAIi Murthuja, v. The Superintending Engineer,

WP/19986/2024 · 2025-09-21

Nyapathy Vijay

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010393332024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3460] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION NO: 19986/2024 Between: 1. SKAII MURTHUJA,, S/O. SK. ANWAR BASHA, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, W/AS PRINTING TECHNICIAN, O/O THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, IRRIGATION CIRCLE, ONGOLE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. THE CHIEF ENGINEER, N.S. PROJECTS, NEAR COLLECTORS OFFICE, GUNTUR,AP. 3. THE ENGINEERINCHIEF, (AW) WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, IRRIGATION COMPOUND. GOVERNOR PET, VIJAYAWADA, AP. 4. STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPLE SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to an appropriate writ, order or direction more 2 particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents 1 to 4 in not considering the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Technical Assistant as per Rule 2 of AP Engineering Subordinate service Rules against the existing vacancy as illegal, improper, unjust and arbitrary and violation of Art.14 and 16 of the Constitution of India and further direct the respondents 1 to 4 forthwith to promote the petitioner as Technical assistant against the existing vacancy with all consequential benefits and pass such other order. IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 1 to 4 forthwith to promote the petitioner as Technical Assistant against the existing vacancy with all consequential benefits and pass such other order. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G SEENA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR SERVICES III The Court made the following: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.19986 of 2024 ORDER: 1. In view of the Letter, dated 18.09.2025 addressed by the learned counsel for the Petitioner to the Registrar (Judicial), the Petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw the Writ Petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. No order as to costs. 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, pending if any, shall stand closed. ________________________ JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY Date: 22.09.2025 IS 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NYAPATHY VIJAY WRIT PETITION No.19986 of 2024 Dated: 22.09.2025 IS