- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25323 WP No. 17096 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 10TH DAY OF JULY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 17096 OF 2024 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SHRIRAM PROPERTIES LTD., COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 2013, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.40/43, 8TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS, SADASHIV NAGAR, BENGALURU-560 080. 2. SHRIPROP DWELLERS PVT. LTD. COMPANY INCORPORATED UNDER COMPANIES ACT, 1956, HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.40/43, 8TH MAIN, 4TH CROSS, SADASHIV NAGAR BENGALURU-560 080. … PETITIONERS (BY SRI. DARSHAN R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE SECRETARY REAL ESTATE REGULATORY AUTHORITY KARNATAKA, HAVING OFFICE AT: Digitally signed by PRAKASH N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25323 WP No. 17096 of 2024 2ND FLOOR, SILVER JUBILEE BLOCK, UNITY BUILDING, CSI COMPOUND, 3RD CROSS, MISSION ROAD, BENGALURU-560 027. 2. SOUMYA RANJAN CHOUDHURY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, S/O. MR. PURUSOTTAM CHOUDHURY, RESIDING AT: NO. 203, VMAKS ROSELLE APARTMENT, ANANTH NAGAR, ELECTRONIC CITY, PHASE 2, BANGALORE-560 100. 3. SASMITA NAYAK AGED ABOUT 39 YEARS, W/O. MR. SOUMYA RANJAN CHOUDHURY, RESIDING AT NO. 203, VMAKS ROSELLE APARTMENT, ANANTH NAGAR, ELECTRONIC CITY, PHASE 2, BANGALORE-560 100. … RESPONDENTS THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET-ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DTD 17.08.23 PASSED BY THE R1 AUTHORITY IN CMP/10374/22 PRODUCED AS ANNEXURE-A AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:25323 WP No. 17096 of 2024 ORAL ORDER Learned Counsel for petitioners has filed a memo which reads as hereunder: "The undersigned Counsel for the Petitioners respectfully submits that the matter referenced above, which was instituted before this Hon'ble High Court on 21-06-2024, has been amicably settled by the parties involved. In light of the aforementioned settlement, this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to dismiss the writ petition as not pressed in the interest of justice and equity." The memo is taken on record. 2. In light of the memo filed, the petition is disposed off as not calling for any adjudication. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE NP