Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
2025:CGHC:15874-DB
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRMP No. 1644 of 2023 1 - Ajay Tiwari S/o Late Dhirendra Tiwari Aged About 53 Years R/o - Sundra Basti Ward No. 15, Barbil, District Kenjudhar, Odisha (Wrongly Mentioned In Annex.P/1 As R/o Sundra Basti Ward No. 15, Barbil, Orrisha (Shri Durga Transport Corporation Badbil Orrisa) 2 - Pushpa Tiwari W/o Ajay Tiwari Aged About 48 Years R/o - Sundra Basti Ward No. 15, Barbil, District Kenjudhar, Odisha (Wrongly Mentioned In Annex.P/1 As R/o Sundra Basti Ward No. 15, Barbil, Orrisha (Shri Durga Transport Corporation Badbil Orrisa) 3 - Suman Tiwari @ Khushbu Tiwari W/o - Satya Prakash Tripathi Aged About 30 Years D/o - Ajay Tiwari, R/o - D Well Heights, Flat No. 403, Nageshwar Residency Road, Patia, Bhubaneshwar, Odisha (Wrongly Mentioned In Annex.P/1 As R/o Sundra Basti Ward No. 15, Barbil, Orrisha (Shri Durga Transport Corporation Badbil Orrisa) 4 - Neha Tiwari D/o Ajay Tiwari Aged About 24 Years R/o 417, Areade Elegance Apartments, Babusapalya, Kalyan Nagar, Bengaluru, Karnataka 560043 (Wrongly Mentioned In Annex. P/1 As R/o Sundra Basti Ward No. 15, Barbil, Orrisha (Shri Durga Transport Corporation Badbil Orrisa). ... Petitioner(s) versus
2 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through- Police Station Jutmil, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 2 - Pramila Pandey D/o Dhiren Pandey Aged About 24 Years R/o - House No. 16/14, Ward No. 41, Turkumuda, Antim Para Sahdebpali, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh 496001. (Complainant)
... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshul Tiwari, Advocate For Respondent/State For Respondent No.2 : : Mr. Shashank Thakur, Addl. AG Ms. Vidhi Matlani, Advocate on behalf of Shri Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate Hon'ble Shri
Ramesh Sinha,
Chief Justice
Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order
on Board
Per
Ramesh Sinha
, Chief Justice
04/04/2025 Heard Mr. Anshul Tiwari, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. Shashank Thakur, learned Additional Advocate General appearing for respondent No1/State and Ms. Vidhi Matlani, Advocate on behalf of Mr. Sanjay Agrawal, Advocate appearing for respondent No.2. 2.
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:
“It is, therefore most humbly prayed before theHon’ble Court that this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant petition and the FIR bearing No. 193/2023 registered at Police Station Jutemill, District Raigarh (CG)
3 may kindly be quashed and if any subsequent proceedings initiated in pursuance of the said FIR may also kindly be quashed, in the interest of justice.”
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present case, investigation has been concluded and charge-sheet has been submitted in the Court concerned. 4. Considering the the submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present petition is dismissed with liberty to the petitioner to take recourse to law, if aggrieved by the charge-sheet and order framing charge. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) (Ramesh Sinha) Judge Chief Justice SUGUNA DUBEY Digitally signed by SUGUNA DUBEY Date: 2025.04.04 17:03:14 +0530