Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27768 (MAD)

S.DURAI v. A.SIVALINGAM PILLAI

SA/1145/2012 · 2025-02-25

R Kalaimathi

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S.A.Nos.1145 and 1146 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 25.02.2025 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MRS. JUSTICE R.KALAIMATHI S.A.Nos.1145 and 1146 of 2012 M.P.No.1 of 2012 SA No. 1145 of 2012 1. S.Durai S/o A.Sivalingam Pillai Polakkunam Village Thiruvannamali Tk Thiruvannamalai Dist ..Appellants Vs. 1. A.Sivalingam Pillai S/o Arunasalam Pillai 2.S.Murugan S/o A.Sivalingam Pillai 3.P.Valarmathi W/o Prakasam 4.Minor Vishnu S/o M.Ranganathan Rep By His Father And Ng M.Ranganathan 5.CHANRA W/o Sivalingam All Are Reside At Polakkunam Village Page 1/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.Nos.1145 and 1146 of 2012 Thiruvannamalai Tk Thiruvannamalai Dist ..Respondent SA No. 1146 of 2012 1. S.Durai Vs. 1. S.Murugan S/o A.Sivalingam Pillai 2.Minor Vishnu S/o M.Ranganathan Rep By His Father And Ng M.Ranganathan Both Reside At Polakkunam Village Thiruvannamlai Tk T.V Dist Common Prayer: These Second Appeals are filed under Section 100 of Civil Procedure Code, against the judgment and decree dated 01.02.2012 made in A.S.Nos.37 & 40 of 2010 on the file of the Principal Subordinate Judge, Thiruvannamalai and confirming the judgment and decree dated 30.06.2010 made in O.S.Nos.403 & 509 of 2006 on the file of the Principal District Munsiff Court, Tiruvannamalai. For Appellants : No appearance in both appeals For R2 to R5 : Mr.D.Govinda Reddy in S.A.NO.1145 of 2012 For R1 : Died steps due in S.A.NO.1145 OF 2012 For respondents : Mr.D.Govinda Reddy in S.A.NO.1146 of 2012 - - - - - Page 2/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.Nos.1145 and 1146 of 2012 COMMON JUDGMENT When these matters came up for hearing on 17.02.2025, the learned counsel for the appellant reported no instructions from the appellant and the name of the appellant is also printed in the cause list, however there is no representation on behalf of the appellant. Hence, these matters are listed on 25.02.2025 under the caption "for dismissal". Accordingly, these matters are listed today under the said caption. 2. Even today, when these matters are taken up for hearing, none represents the appellant. Hence, these Second Appeals stand dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petition is closed. 25.02.2025 gbi To 1.The Principal Subordinate Judge, Thiruvannamalai. 2.The Principal District Munsiff Court, Tiruvannamalai. Page 3/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.Nos.1145 and 1146 of 2012 R.KALAIMATHI, J. gbi S.A.Nos.1145 and 1146 of 2012 25.02.2025 Page 4/4 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis