RAMPRASAD S/O LATE SHRI UMRAV v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/10453/2025 · 2025-09-11
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27765 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27765 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:37087] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Second Bail Application No. 10453/2025 Ramprasad S/o Late Shri Umrav, Aged About 21 Years, R/o Banjaro Ki Dhani Bhamolav Police Station Arai, District Ajmer. (At Present In Central Jail, Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendra Singh Sinsinwar For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Singh Rathore, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 11/09/2025
1. Instant second bail application under Section 483 of BNSS has been filed by the accused petitioner after submission of charge-sheet in connection with FIR No.126/2024 registered at Police Station Arai, District Ajmer, for offences under Sections 80(2), 85 and 115(2) of BNS 2023.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record.
3. It appears that after submission of the charge-sheet, charges for offences under Sections 80(2) and 85 of BNS 2023, have been framed against the accused petitioner and criminal case is pending at the stage of prosecution evidence. Petitioner’s wife, namely, Guddi, died on 27.09.2024 in the hospital within a period of one year from her marriage with the petitioner. Allegation made
[2025:RJ-JP:37087] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-10453/2025] against the petitioner is to physically assault his wife whereby she received serious injuries, due to which, she succumbed to death, during her treatment in the hospital. In the Post-Mortem Report (PMR), several injuries on the corpus of deceased have been observed and cause of death has been assigned due to grievous injuries on her body parts.
5. Petitioner is in custody since 02.04.2025 and after framing of charges, none of the prosecution witnesses have been examined.
6. At this stage, this Court does not deem it just and proper to release the accused petitioner on bail, against whom charge-sheet has been filed for grievous nature of offence of dowry death.
7. Instant criminal miscellaneous second bail application is accordingly hereby dismissed. However, petitioner would be at liberty to move a fresh bail application before trial Court, after recording statements of material witnesses including father and two uncles of the deceased, namely, Sardar, Mohan and Sanwara.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J SUNIL SOLANKI/1