APHC010007812003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY SIXTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22442/2003 Between: 1. G.M.,KURNOOL DIST.COOP.CENTRAL BANK, KURNOOL DISTRICT COOPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., KURNOOL. ...PETITIONER AND 1. APPELLATE AUTH PAYMENT OF GRATUITY KURNOOL, CUM- DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR., KURNOOL ZONE, KURNOOL. 2. CONTROLLING AUTHORITY UNDER PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT, AND ASST.COMMISSIONER OF LABOUR., KURNOOL. 3. K NARAYANA REDDY, H.NO.4/149/87., TEACHERS COLONY, DHONE, ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue Writ order of direction more particularly a Writ of Mandamus declaring the order of the 2nd Respondent herein in P.G.Case No.22/2002 dated 19-12-2002 as confirmed by the Ist Respondent in P.G.Case No.21/2003 dated 24-05-2003 as illegal and set aside the same and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WVMP 4296 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order passed by this Hon'ble Court in W.P.M.P.No.28051 of 2003 in the above WP dt 24-10-2003 and pass. IA NO: 2 OF 2003(WPMP 28051 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Stay the withdrawal of the amount by the 3rd Respondent paid by the Petitioner bank to the credit of P.G.Case No.21/2003 on the file of Ist Respondent pending disposal of the above W.P. and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P KRISHNA PRAKASH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR LABOUR 2. R V SUBBA RAO The Court made the following: ORDER Despite listing the matter under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for the petitioner. This shows that the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the matter. In view of the above, this writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI RR