Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27755 (RAJ)

KIRAN SHARMA DAUGHTER OF SUMAN DATT SHARMA AND WIFE OF LATE. RAVI DUTT SHARMA v. SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT

CW/12350/2025 · 2025-08-19

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:32430] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12350/2025 Kiran Sharma D/o Suman Datt Sharma and W/o Late. Ravi Dutt Sharma, Aged About 50 Years, Address House Number 795, Jyoti Mandir Road, Dadabari Extension, Kota (Rajasthan) 324009. ----Petitioner Versus 1. Secretary to Government, Women and Child Development Department and Panchayati Raj (Women and Child Development) Department, Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 302005. 2. Commissioner, Women Empowerment Department, Rajasthan, J-7, Jhalana Institutional Area, Jhalana Doongri, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 302004. 3. Chairman, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Institute of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 302018. 4. Secretary, Rajasthan Staff Selection Board, State Institute of Agriculture Management Premises, Durgapura, Jaipur (Rajasthan) 302018. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tribhuvan Narayan Singh For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 19/08/2025 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has submitted a representation dated 30.06.2025 (Annexure-10) narrating her grievances more particularly in Para No.3 of the same but while deciding the said representation, the respondents have not addressed the issues so raised and rejected the candidature of the petitioner while only addressing one grievance [2025:RJ-JP:32430] (2 of 2) [CW-12350/2025] i.e. the cut off marks under GN-Widow category whereas other issues raised in the representation have not been addressed. He further submits that the petitioner would be satisfied if a direction is issued to respondent No.4 to re-adjudicate the representation of the petitioner (Annexure-10), with regard to all the grievances raised by the petitioner in Para No.3 of the said representation in a time bound manner. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar and perused the material available on record. 3. In view of the submissions made hereinabove, the Petitioner is directed to re-submit the representation within a period of two (2) weeks from today and the Respondent No.4 is directed to decide the representation re-submitted by the Petitioner within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of filing of the representation by a speaking order, strictly in accordance with law. 4. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide such representation has been issued only with a view to ensure an expeditious redressal of the petitioner’s grievance. The same shall not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 6. All the pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J DEEPA-22