APHC010393852025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] TUESDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 20047 of 2025 Between: 1. G VEERA BHASKARA RAO, (AC.2-64 CENTS IN SY.121,122) S/O. NOOKALU, AGE 52 YEARS, RESIDENT OF KOMARAGIRI, U.KOTHAPALLL MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT 2. GULLAPALLI SRINIVAS,, (AC.1-18 CENTS IN SY. 121- 11,122/7,122/1 0 S/O. NOOKALU, AGE 52 YEARS, R/O. D.NO.5-7, SAGARANAGARAM, VTC KOMARAGIRI, U.KOTHAPAHI MANDAL, KAKINADA DIST. 3. S.K.SRINIVAS,, (AC.0-50 CENTS IN SY.122/16) S/O. NAGARAJU, AGE 42 YEARS, R/O. NAGAMPETA, KOMARAGIRI, U.KOTHAPAHI MANDAL, KAKINADA DIST. 4. G.KRISHNA,, (AC.0-96 CENTS IN SY.121,122) S/O. NUKALU, AGE 60 YEARS, R/O. KOMARAGIRI, U.KOTHAPAHI MANDAL, KAKINADA DIST. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPT., SECRETARIAT, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKINADA DISTRICT, KAKINADA 3. THE MANDAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE, COURT/TAHSILDAR MANDAL REVENUE OFFICE, U.KOTHAPAHI, KAKINADA DISTRICT 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, U.KOTHAPAHI P.S., KAKINADA DISTRICT 5. SRI SEETHA RAMA SWAMY VARI DEVASTHANAM, GOR ASA, REP BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER, U.KOTHAPAHI GROUP OF TEMPLES, KAKINADA DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 3rd Respondents proceedings in M.C. No. 117/2025 dated 26-07-2025 in respect of the lands in Sy. No. 121 and 122 of of Komaragiri Village, U.Kothapalli Mandal, Kakinada District and interfering with petitioners possession and enjoyment and further trying to dispossess over the properties to their respective extent of petitioners as illegal, arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. THOTA RAMAKOTESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: Learned counsel for the petitioners, after arguing for some time, sought leave of this Court for withdrawal of the Writ Petition with a liberty to avail appropriate remedy under law and he also made endorsement on the bundle to that effect. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty sought for. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 05.08.2025 siva 4 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No.20047 of 2025 Date: 05.08.2025 siva