Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27750 (AP)

P. Umapati Reddy, v. Sri. Chamakuri Sridhar,

CC/3606/2024 · 2025-02-06

Ravi Cheemalapati

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

-«3S^ IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI THURSDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3606 OF 2024 Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to punish the respondents/contemnors herein under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act for willfully, wantonly and disobediently in not implementing the order dt 08.11.2023 in W.P.No.21645 of 2023 passed by this Hon’ble High Court. Between: 1. P. Umapati Reddy, S/o. Malli Reddy, Aged about 50 years, R/o. Nuliveedu Village H/o. Nakkalavandia Palli, Galiveedu Mandal, Annamayya District. 2. S. Balanarayana, S/o. Venkataiah, Aged about 58 years, R/o. B K Palli Village, Reddy Colony, Madanapalli Mandal, Annamayya District. ...Petitioners AND 1. Sri. Chamakuri Sridhar, The District Collector, Rayachoty, Chittoor District, Now Annamaya District. 2. Sri Yoga Swaroop, The Sub-Collector, Madanapalle, Chittoor District, Now Annamaya District. 3. Sri. Kathijabi, The Tahsildar, Madanapalle Mandal, Chittoor District, Now Annamaya District. ...Respondents Counsel for the Petitioners: SRI DODDAKA HARSHA VARDHAN Counsel for the Respondents: SRI NAGARAJU PULLAGURA The Court made the following: % APHC010394392024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) 0M0 [3332] THURSDAY ,THE SIXTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI CONTEMPT CASE NO: 3606/2024 Between; P. Umapati Reddy, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Sri Chamakuri Sridhar and Others ...CONTEMNOR(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. DODDAKA HARSHA VARDHAN Counsel for the Contemnor(S): 1.NAGARAJU PULLAGURA The Court made the following: ORDER: This Contempt Case is filed under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, for the willful disobedience of the orders dated 08.11.2023 passed in W.P.No.21645 of 2023. Sri P.Vasu Raghavendra Rao, learned counsel representing Sri D.Harsha Vardhan, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the order of this Court disobedience of which is complained of, in this Contempt has been complied with, therefore nothing remains for further adjudication in this Contempt Case and the same may be closed. Recording the said submission, this Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// /rSECTION OFFICER 1. Sri. Chamakuri Sridhar, The District Collector, Rayachoty, Chittoor District, NowAnnamaya District. 2. Sri Yoga Swaroop, The Sub-Collector, Madanapalle, Chittoor District, Now Annamaya District. 3. Sri. Kathijabi, The Tahsildar, Madanapalle Mandal, Chittoor District, Now Annamaya District. 4. One CC to Sri. Doddaka Harsha Vardhan, Advocate [OPUC] 5. One CC to Sri. Nagaraju Pullagura, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Three CD Copies To, PR sree HIGH COURT DATED:06/02/2025 ORDER CC.No.3606 of 2024 2 5 MAH 2625 | ^ ^ Cgrrenl SMlion ''v5espATC«S»^ CLOSING THE CONTEMPT CASE WITHOUT COSTS