2025:JHHC:28264 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI (Civil Writ Jurisdiction) W.P. (C) No.5887 of 2019 ---- Lal Gyan Ranjan Nath Shahdeo aged about 31 years, son of Sri Lal Chintamani Nath Shahdeo, resident of Sukhdeo Nagar, P.O & P.S.- Sukhdeo Nagar, Ratu Road, District – Ranchi (Jharkhand). …. …. Petitioner(s) Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand. 2. The Principal Secretary, Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms Department Project Building, P.O.-Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi. 3. The Principal Secretary, Administrative Reforms Personal and Rajbhasa Department, Project Building P.O. Dhurwa, P.S.-Jagarnathpur, District Ranchi. 4. Deputy Commissioner, Lohardaga, P.O. & P.S.-Lohardaga District- Lohardaga. 5. District Sub Registrar, Lohardaga, P.O. & P.S. Lohardaga, District- Lohardaga. 6. Land Reforms, Deputy Collector, P.O., P.S. and District lohardaga. Lohardaga, 7. Circle Officer, Lohardaga, P.O. + P.S.-Lohardaga, District Lohardaga. 8. Lal Madhusudan Nath Shahdeo, son of Late lal Girwar Nath Shahdeo, resident of Barang, P.Ο.-Hutar P.S.-Ghaghra, District Gumla. 9. Shanaz Begum wife of Reyan Ansari, resident of village- Kaimo, Mahua Toli, P.O. & P.S. Hirhi, District- Lohardaga. …. …. Respondent(s) ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH KUMAR ---- For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Sandeep Verma, Adv. For the Respondent(s) : Mr. Mukesh Kr. Mahto, A.C. to G.P.6 ---- 06/Dated: 15th September, 2025 1. The present writ petition has been filed for following reliefs:- “for issuance of appropriate writ(s) / order(s) / direction (s) for the quashing the order dated 16.08.2019 passed by the Deputy Commissioner Lohardaga, contained in Annexure 5 to the writ petition by which the respondent No.-4 erroneously rejected illegally has the complaint fraudulent registration record No.-and being 01 of 2019/2020 filed by the petitioner contrary to the 2025:JHHC:28264 Page | 2 W.P. (C) No.5887 of 2019 provision contained Registration Act and in Section 83 of the circular dated 21.09.2016 issued by the department of Revenue registration and Land Reform and for other relief or reliefs to which the petitioner is legally entitled to.” 2. After some arguments, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to work out his remedy in accordance with law. 3. Learned counsel for the other side has no objection. 4. Permission is granted. 5. Accordingly, the present writ petition is hereby disposed of as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. (Rajesh Kumar, J.) 15th September, 2025 Amar/- Uploaded