M/S ANJUM ENTERPRISES PVT LTD v. M/S T V S MOTOR COMPANY LTD
RFA/1405/2017 · 2025-06-26
Jyoti Mulimani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27741 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27741 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22376 RFA No. 1405 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI MULIMANI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 1405 OF 2017 BETWEEN:
M/S. ANJUM ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., REGISTERED OFFICE, NO.294, DAWOOD KHAN ROAD, MYSURU-570 001.
REPRESENTED BY THIER MANAGER. …APPELLANT [ABSENT]
AND:
1.
M/S. T V S MOTOR COMPANY LTD., NO. 1, BYTHAHALLI, KADAKOLA POST, MYSURU, REPRESENTED BY POWER AGENT/ SUBROGEE, M/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE CO. LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE-171 000, M.M.REDDY COMPLEX, OLD BANGALORE ROAD, HOSUR, REPRESENTED BY THEIR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, SHRI. K.PANNER SELVAN, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS.
2.
M/S. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LTD., DIVISIONAL OFFICE-171000, M.M.REDDY COMPLEX, OLD BANGALORE ROAD, HOSUR, REPRESENTED BY THEIR DIVISIONAL MANAGER, SHRI. K.PANNER SELVAM, AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P.S.RANGANATHAM., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO 2)
Digitally signed by PREMCHANDRA M R Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22376 RFA No. 1405 of 2017
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF THE CPC.
THIS REGULAR FIRST APPEAL IS LISTED FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, AN ORDER IS MADE AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER The name of appellant is called out thrice in the open Court. There is no representation on behalf of the appellant. The appellant is absent. As could be seen from the daily order sheet, the appeal was listed on 19.06.2025, on that day, counsel Sri.N.Kumar., was permitted to retire from the case and the office was directed to print the name of appellant in the cause list and the appeal was ordered to be listed on 26.06.2025. The appeal is listed today by printing the name of the appellant in the cause list. The appellant has neither engaged the services of an advocate nor conducted the case as a party in person. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Hence, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22376 RFA No. 1405 of 2017
Because of dismissal of the appeal, interim order granted if any stands discharged and pending interlocutory applications if any are disposed of. Sd/- (JYOTI MULIMANI) JUDGE TKN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 13