Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27741 (HP)

Vipin Kumar v. Suman Malhotra

CMP.M/2088/2024 · 2025-03-26

Sushil Kukreja, Tarlok Singh Chauhan

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Vipin Kumar vs. Suman Malhotra CMP(M) No. 2088 of 2024 26.03.2025 Present: Mr. Deender K. Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/ appellant. Mr. Surinder K. Sharma, Advocate, for the respondent. Mr. Surinder K. Sharma, learned Advocate, has put in appearance on behalf of the respondents. For the reasons stated in the application, which is duly supported by the affidavit of the appellant/applicant, we find sufficient cause having been carved out, which prevented the applicant from filing the appeal within the prescribed period of limitation. Accordingly, the delay of 48 days in filing of the appeal is condoned. Application stands disposed of. FAO (FC) No. _____ of 2025 Appeal be registered. List for admission on 02.04.2025. (Tarlok Singh Chauhan) Judge (Sushil Kukreja) Judge 26th March, 2025 (sanjeev)