IBRAHIM SK @ IBRAHIM SHEKH v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
A.B.A./380/2025 · 2025-01-24
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2774 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2774 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
A.B.A. No.380 of 2025
------ Ibrahim Sk @ Ibrahim Shekh, aged about 24 years, Son of Asraful Sk., Resident of Village- Jhikarhati, Post Office- Jhikarhatti, Police Station- Pakur (M), District- Pakur (Jharkhand)
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus
The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Ms. Nitu Sinha, Advocate
For the State
: Ms. Ruby Pandey, Addl.P.P
------
Order No.02 Dated- 24-01-2025
Heard the parties.
Apprehending his arrest in connection with Pakur Muffasil P.S. Case No.229 of 2024 instituted under Sections 303(2), 3 (5) of the B.N.S., 2023, Rule 54 of Jharkhand Minor Minerals Concession Rules (JMMC Rules), Section 4/21 of the Mines and Minerals (Development & Regulation) Act, and Rule 7, 9, 13 of Jharkhand Minerals (Prevention of Illegal Mining, Transportation and Storage) Rules, 2017, the petitioner has moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner is the driver of a vehicle bearing Registration No. JH16H 1739 which was seized by police while being involved in transportation of illegally excavated stones chips. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-06 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is lastly submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be given the privileges of anticipatory bail.
Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.
Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and
circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to surrender in the Court below within six weeks from today and in the event of his arrest or surrendering, he will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.20,000/- as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Pakur in connection with Pakur Muffasil P.S. Case No.229 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Animesh/