VIJAY BAHADUR CHAUDHARY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 6 OTHERS
WRIC/7100/2025 · 2025-03-10
Shekhar B Saraf, Vipin Chandra Dixit
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27739 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 27739 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:35694-DB
Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 7100 of 2025 Petitioner :- Vijay Bahadur Chaudhary Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 6 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Shri Niwash Yadav Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Vipin Chandra Dixit,J.
1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State.
2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the complaint/representation dated December 27, 2022 filed by the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid complaint/representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided.
4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent No.2 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the complaint/representation of the petitioner.
5. Accordingly, the respondent No.2/District Level Caste Scrutiny Committee, Maharajganj is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid complaint/representation of the petitioner within a period of twelve weeks from date in accordance with law, after granting an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner as well as respondent Nos.3 to 7.
6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 11.3.2025 Kuldeep (Vipin Chandra Dixit, J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf, J.) Digitally signed by :- KULDEEP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad