1st Sept.,2025 Item no.M/L 57 Court No. 14 Pradip, A.R.(Ct.) In the High Court at Calcutta Constitutional Writ Jurisdiction Appellate Side Case No. WPA 14249 of 2024 In the matter of : Winsome International Ltd. …. Petitioner VS. The Union of India & Ors. ….Respondents For the Petitioner: Mr. Shiv Shankar Banerjee Mr. Abhishek Chakraborty ….Advocates For the Respondent nos. 1-3: Mr. Anjan Chakraborty ….Advocate 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record. 2. The petitioner submits that certain amount is due and payable from the Jute Commissioner on account of transportation charges. 3. Learned advocate representing the Union of India submits that his client is not liable to make payment. 4. On a perusal of the writ petition and upon hearing the submissions made on behalf of the petitioner it appears that, demand of payment is not annexed to the writ petition. 5. In view of the above, the instant writ petition is disposed of by observing that it will be open for the petitioner to raise demand, if any, before the competent authority. 6. In the event such demand is raised, the same shall be considered in accordance with law at the earliest. Page 2 7. The writ petition stands disposed of. 8. Urgent photostat certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties upon compliance of all requisite formalities. (Amrita Sinha, J.)