Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27730 (HP)

RAVI KUMAR v. STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER

CWP/1372/2025 · 2025-03-05

Jyotsna Rewal Dua

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP Nos.1304-1313, 1350-1361, 1365-1367, 1369-1374, and 1396 of 2025 Date of decision: 05.03.2025 1. CWP No.1304 of 2025 Rajni Sharma. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 2. CWP No.1305 of 2025 Krishna Devi & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 3. CWP No.1306 of 2025 Renu Bala & Anr. ...Petitioners. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 4. CWP No.1307 of 2025 Monika Mishra & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 5. CWP No.1308 of 2025 Sunil Chand & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes -2- 6. CWP No.1309 of 2025 Ruby Vaidya. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 7. CWP No.1310 of 2025 Suman Kumari & Anr. ...Petitioners. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 8. CWP No.1311 of 2025 Sukhdev. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 9. CWP No.1312 of 2025 Ritu Sharma. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 10. CWP No.1313 of 2025 Jeet Raj & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 11. CWP No.1350 of 2025 Sachi Mohan. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. -3- 12. CWP No.1351 of 2025 Amit Kumar. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 13. CWP No.1352 of 2025 Mukesh Sharma & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 14. CWP No.1353 of 2025 Suman Kumar. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 15. CWP No.1354 of 2025 Ajay Kumar. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 16. CWP No.1355 of 2025 Rajesh Kumar. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 17. CWP No.1356 of 2025 Meenakshi. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. -4- 18. CWP No.1357 of 2025 Kumari Manisha & Anr. ...Petitioners. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 19. CWP No.1358 of 2025 Namesh Kumar. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 20. CWP No.1359 of 2025 Pawan Kumar. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 21. CWP No.1360 of 2025 Puran Chand. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 22. CWP No.1361 of 2025 Saroj Bala & Anr. ...Petitioners. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 23. CWP No.1365 of 2025 Seema Rani & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. -5- 24. CWP No.1366 of 2025 Awinash Kumar & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 25. CWP No.1367 of 2025 Bhuvneshwar & Anr. ...Petitioners. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 26. CWP No.1369 of 2025 Joginder Pal. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 27. CWP No.1370 of 2025 Padam Singh. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 28. CWP No.1371 of 2025 Joginder Kumar. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 29. CWP No.1372 of 2025 Ravi Kumar. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. -6- 30. CWP No.1373 of 2025 Vinod Kumar & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 31. CWP No.1374 of 2025 Sheetal Kumar & Anr. ...Petitioners. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. 32. CWP No.1396 of 2025 Rajender Kumar Rattan. ...Petitioner. Versus State of HP and Anr. ...Respondents. Coram: Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners : Ms. Nandita, Advocate, proxy Mr. Vaibhav Tanwar, Advocate. For the respondent(s) : Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Y.P.S. Dhaulta, Additional Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that due to developments that have taken place post the filing of the writ petitions, more specifically the enactment, i.e., The Himachal Pradesh Recruitment and Conditions of Service of Government Employees Act, 2024, the writ petitions, in their -7- present form, cannot proceed ahead, therefore, the petitioners be permitted to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to file afresh in accordance with law, inter alia, assailing the aforesaid enactment. 2. Prayer is accepted. Granting such liberty, present petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua 5th March, 2025 Judge (Pardeep)