Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27729 (GAU)

Shridam Barman v. The State of AP

IA(Crl)/104/2025 · 2025-11-05

Budi Habung

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC040017852025 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : IA(Crl)/104/2025 Shridam Barman Son of Late Shibindra Barman, permanent resident of Village Jorpatki, PO and PS Coochbeehar, District CoochBeehar, West Bengal and present resident of Gandhi market, Itanagar, PO and PS Itanagar, Papum Pare District, Arunachal Pradesh. VERSUS The State of AP represented by the PP of AP Advocate for the Petitioner : Mepe Ete, Punyo Harming,Jumge Karbak Advocate for the Respondent : P P of AP, Linked Case :BA/135/2025 Shridam Barman Age: 50 Occupation : Address:Son of Late Shibindra Barman permanent resident of Village Jorpatki PO and PS Coochbeehar District Cooch Beehar West Bengal and present resident of Gandhi Market Itanagar PO and PS Itanagar Papum Pare District Arunachal Pradesh. Page No.# 2/2 VERSUS The State of AP Age: 0 Occupation : Address:represented by the PP of AP ------------ Advocate for : Jumge Karbak Advocate for : P P of AP appearing for The State of AP: Advocate appearing for respectively. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BUDI HABUNG ORDER Date : 06.11.2025 In view of the order passed today in BA No.135(AP)/2025, this interlocutory application (criminal) has become infructuous. Accordingly, the interlocutory application (criminal) stands disposed of on being infructuous. JUDGE Comparing Assistant