IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Cr.MMO No. 1299 of 2024 Decided on : 28.06.2025 Mr. Neeraj Verma, ....Petitioner Versus State of H.P. & others ....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr Justice Rakesh Kainthla, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? No. For the petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Thakur, Advocate. For the respondent/State : Mr. Ajit Sharma, Deputy Advocate General. None for respondents No.2 to 6. Rakesh Kainthla, Judge (Oral) Perusal of the record shows that a joint petition has been filed for quashing of two different F.I.Rs. Prima facie, it appears that the present petition is not maintainable and two separate petitions are required to be filed for quashing of two F.I.Rs. 2 Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present petition with liberty to file two separate petitions for quashing of F.I.Rs. Ordered accordingly. (Rakesh Kainthla) Judge 28th June, 2025 (ravinder)