APHC010393382025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY, THE SEVENTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 20379/2025 Between: D. RUPESH, S/O D. RAVIKUMAR, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC. BUSINESS, R/O. 19-589/1C4, FLAT NO. 304, MUKTHA HEIGHTS APARTMENT, FOREST ROAD, MITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, AMARAVATHI AT VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, CHITTOOR DISTRICT. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, I TOWN POLICE STATION, CHITTOOR, CHITTOOR DISTRICT.. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. D PURNACHANDRA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of respondent No. 4 viz., Cl of Police, I Town Police Station, Chittoor in interfering into the money lending transactions between the petitioner and one N. Uday Kumar by forcing the petitioner to come for settlement as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and consequently direct the respondent No. 4 viz.. Cl of Police, I town Police Station, Chittoor not to interfere into the money lending transactions by threatening/forcing the petitioner to come for a settlement.” 2 2. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that the Police are not interfering in the money transactions between the parties and are not threatening the Petitioner to settle the dispute and also no crime has been registered against the Petitioner. 3. Sri D.Purnachandra Reddy, learned counsel for the Petitioner would submit, recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 4. Considering the submissions made, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:07.08.2025 Dinesh 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.20379 of 2025 Dt.07.08.2025 Dinesh