Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27723 (RAJ)

SAUMYA KHAJ S/O SHRI SHANKAR LAL MEENA v. THE CENTRAL BOARD OF SECONDARY EDUCATION

CW/12349/2025 · 2025-08-18

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12349/2025 Saumya Khaj S/o Shri Shankar Lal Meena, Aged About 17 Years, (Minor) Through His Natural Guardian- Shankar Lal Meena S/o Shri Motilal Meena, Aged 51 Years, R/o Village/post Sultanpur, Behind Senior Secondary School, Tehsil Digod, District Kota (Rajasthan) ----Petitioner Versus 1. The Central Board Of Secondary Education, Regional Office, Todarmal Marg, Ajmer (Rajasthan) Through The Regional Officer. 2. The Controller Of Examination, Central Board Of Secondary Education, Cbse Integrated Office Complex, Sector 23, Dwarka, New Delhi. 3. The Principal, Sainik School, Bhilwara Road Chittorgarh (Rajasthan). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. S.N.Meena For Respondent(s) : JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 18/08/2025 1. The instant writ petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer:- (i) by issuance of suitable writ, direction or order in the nature thereof thereby the Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondents to made correction in date of birth as 19.11.2008 in place of 17.11.2008 in marks sheet cum certificate of the petitioner and directed to issuing correct/amended marks statement cum certificate of the Secondary 2024 (Roll. No. 11162300) School Examination running by the Central Board of Secondary Education at the (2 of 3) [CW-12349/2025] earliest and further Hon'ble court may kindly took disciplinary action against the defaulter authorities concerned. ii) Any other order or direction, which your lordships may deem just and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, may kindly be passed in favour of the appellant and in the interest of justice. iii) The writ petition may kindly be allowed throughout with costs.” 2. By way of filing this writ petition, the petitioner is seeking direction against the respondents for making necessary correction with regard to the correct date of birth of the petitioner in his mark sheet and certificate of Class-X. 3. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the correct date of birth of the petitioner is 19.11.2008 but due to inadvertent mistake it has been recorded as 17.11.2008 in the petitioner mark- sheet and certificate of Class-X. Counsel submits that an application was submitted by the petitioner in this regard before the school and the same was forwarded to the respondent-CBSE on 27.08.2024 and on 23.06.2025 but inspite of passing of considerable time, till date, the application submitted by the petitioner has not been decided by the respondent-CBSE, so appropriate direction be issued to the respondent -CBSE to decide the application within a stipulated time. 4. Considering the limited prayer made by the counsel for the petitioners, the instant writ petition stands disposed of by issuing a direction to the respondent-CBSE to decide the application (pending, if any) expeditiously as early as possible preferably (3 of 3) [CW-12349/2025] within a period of two weeks from the date of receipt of certified a copy of this order. 5. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Ashu/28