Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27722 (JHR)

PINTU SAW v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./7155/2024 · 2025-06-18

Sri Ananda Sen

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:16051 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 7155 of 2024 Pintu Saw, son of Sita Ram Saw @ Sita Ram Sah, resident of Ward No. 26, Prabhat Colony, P.O and P.S. Chas, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand ..... Petitioner(s). Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Dadan Pathak, son of Sitaram Pathak, resident of Kunwar Singh Colony, P.O and P.S. Chas, District- Bokaro, Jharkhand 827013 … Opp. Party(s). ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. Baibhaw Gahlaut, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Shiv Shankar Kumar, A.P.P For the Informant Mr. Vishal Srivastava, Advocate. …..... 06/18.06.2025: This anticipatory bail application under Section(s) 482 and 484 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioner apprehending his arrest for offences registered under Section(s) 341, 323, 504, 506, 406 and 420 IPC. Heard the parties at length and had gone through the documents, annexed along with this application. Opportunity was given to the State and the informant to oppose the bail, which they availed and opposed. The allegation against this petitioner is that he along with his wife took the informant for visit the land and they said that they went to construct market over the land. Thereafter, the petitioner and his wife asked the informant for some monetary help and they assured the informant to return the money after getting the loan amount from the Bank. The informant gave huge money to the petitioner on different dates. It is alleged that this petitioner handed over cheques but the same got dishonoured. It is further alleged that the informant confronted the petitioner and when the informant asked about dishonour of the cheque, the petitioner abused him. After hearing the parties, I find that the crux of the allegation is in respect of non- payment of money and dishonour of cheque, thus, I am inclined to allow this anticipatory bail application. Accordingly, the petitioner, above named, is directed to surrender before the court below within four weeks from today and in the event of his surrender/arrest, the court below is directed to enlarge him on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Bokaro, in connection with Chas P.S. Case No. 94 of 2024 subject to condition that one of the bailers should be close relative of the petitioner and other should be a resident of State of Jharkhand, having sufficient landed property in his/her name or in the name of his/her ancestors in which he/she is having share and to that effect, he/she has to file an affidavit before the Trial Court indicating his/her share in the property. Anu/-C.P.-3 (ANANDA SEN, J.)