Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27722 (AP)

M/s RKEC PROJECTS LIMITED - YFC PROJECTS PVT.LTD v. UNION OF INDIA

WP/20105/2024 · 2025-04-01

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010394692024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 20105/2024 Between: 1. M/S RKEC PROJECTS LIMITED - YFC PROJECTS PVT.LTD, REP BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER, SOMANADFI NAMBURU, DOOR NO. 10- 12-1,3RD FLOOR, REDNAM ALCAZAR, REDNAM GARDENS, OPP.SBI MAIN BRANCH, VISAKHAPATNAM-530002. ...PETITIONER AND 1. UNION OF INDIA, REP BY ITS CHAIRMAN AND CEO RAILWAY BOARD, ROOM NO. 256A, RAIL BHAVAN, RAISINA ROAD, NEW DELHI, INDIA. 2. THE RAIL LAND DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, A STATUTORY AUTHORITY UNDER MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS, REP BY ITS CHIEF PROJECT MANAGER/BBS, UNIT NO. 702B, 7TH FLOOR, KONNECTUS TOWERLL, DMRC BUILDING, AJMERI GATE, NEW DELHI, 110002. 3. THE GENERAL MANAGER, EAST COAST RAILWAY, CHANDRASEKHARPUR, BHUBANESWAR - 751023. 4. THE CHIEF PROJECT MANAGER/GSU, EAST COAST RAILWAYS WALTAIR, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ or order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction of the respondent in not considering the representaiton of the petitoner dated 31-07-2024, 21-08- 2024, as highy arbitary and illegal and consquntially direct the resondent no.4 to provide reasons for rejecting the bid and pass speaking order on the ground for the rejection/disqualification and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent no.4 to consider and dispose off the representations dated 31-07-2024, 21-08-2024 of the petitioner forthwith preferably within 2 weeks pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. VENKAT SAILENDRA G Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. A V S RAMA KRISHNA The Court made the following: :: ORDER :: In pursuance of Memo filed vide U.S.R.No.34813 of 2025, dated 28.03.2025, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the present writ petition. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 01.04.2025 TVN 137 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.20105 OF 2024 Date: 01.04.2025 TVN