Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 27721 (RAJ)

RADHEY SHYAM BAIRWA SON OF SHRI GANDI LAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/12481/2025 · 2025-08-29

Mahendar Kumar Goyal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:34649] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 12481/2025 Radhey Shyam Bairwa Son Of Shri Gandi Lal, Aged About 52 Years, Resident Of Near Karauli Phatak, Ram Chand Nagar, Gangapurcity, Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Secretary, Department Of Home, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Lal Kothi, Tonk Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. Superintendent Of Police, Sawaimadhopur, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Amit Mathur For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL Order 29/08/2025 Although, in the writ petition, the petitioner has prayed that the order dated 31.12.2018 passed by the disciplinary authority and the appellate order dated 13.08.2019 be quashed and set aside; but, learned counsel submits that he would feel contented if the respondent no.3 is directed to decide the representation submitted to him through registered post dated 06.02.2024, expeditiously. Heard. Considered. Taking into consideration the nature of prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner and a judgement of this Court in the case of Pawan Meena Vs. The State of Rajasthan and [2025:RJ-JP:34649] (2 of 2) [CW-12481/2025] Others: S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.1665/2024, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of this writ petition in following terms without issuing notice to the respondents:- “The respondent no.3-the Superintendent of Police, Sawaimadhopur is directed to pass a reasoned and speaking order on the representation submitted by the petitioner to him through registered post dated 06.02.2024 within a period of 12 weeks from the date of communication of this order with intimation of the decision to the petitioner.” Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of accordingly. (MAHENDAR KUMAR GOYAL),J PRAGATI/50